Received: from mail-ee0-f62.google.com ([74.125.83.62]:49934) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XWXau-00028z-2X for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:26:00 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f62.google.com with SMTP id b57sf539413eek.17 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v1LYVvjgsDzOSUixFx0KLE49w9Bpra7l+lzUGRxSvD0=; b=n44N2HWNGx0+8+BZfVrmanR9J5ko+JSAgGHc9C293JC+kW9SL8ZJKmK+JoBASzWP0o OgLfcuMq23owTUXYYTBWYLCRgPQhcJeJbFSgO4XO/i0ipdkMccBkUe8QEAAXmDJ9v7tE lt3btumunGWz5DGXRXsjTugNc87sHMlnVvYFnXgXOJCj4zJnISafssbpB83HTbXhGOce 9EypnkU+6kpP71xJiBsGeyV0HO5cpsniZkYPW0lV26DVYZynTHswMjJNmp+6/ZJCDz0j hge70ctJRmDuUx3uVT6xr2lRlmi2s2DJEjl/LFsak2bbGkMIR/tIRrgaRL6zfYb7DwaY SWOw== X-Received: by 10.152.21.71 with SMTP id t7mr444lae.42.1411507549026; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.19.73 with SMTP id c9ls86350lae.37.gmail; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.21.137 with SMTP id v9mr331039lae.1.1411507547895; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1si223334wib.0.2014.09.23.14.25.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f; Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y10so5399909wgg.6 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.95.66 with SMTP id di2mr6709787wib.60.1411507547760; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.208] ([95.147.224.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm17253995wjy.22.2014.09.23.14.25.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5421E577.7030608@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 22:26:15 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120711 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Logos Initiative References: <1411477094.38293.YahooMailNeo@web181101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <10015234.iSzs6ACWpT@caracal> <1411491978.17934.YahooMailNeo@web181104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1411491978.17934.YahooMailNeo@web181104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - 'John E Clifford' via lojban, On 23/09/2014 18:06: > "Logical language" does have a number of uses and Lojban fails in > just about all of them (including "having a bsic grammar based on > symbolic logic", though it comes closest to this one). As usual, what > I mean is a language in which every utterance is traceable to a > unique representation in a suitable logic formalism, which > representation correctly gives the meaning of the utterance, and is > reached from the linguistic form by automatic formal rules (parsing). This is pretty much what I mean too, and I think it is the most sensible un= derstanding of "logical language". A possible area of difference is that I hold that the formal specification = of the language must specify the predicate--argument structure encoded by a= sentence but need not formally specify the meaning of every (or any) predi= cate, and hence need not formally model the world or the universe of ideas. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.