Received: from mail-wg0-f57.google.com ([74.125.82.57]:37208) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XWvy8-0002IJ-8s for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:39 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f57.google.com with SMTP id y10sf671782wgg.22 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GpXgnbC6HIYfVRUxRyD5xBwLiAnV650LBS6TOduMsBg=; b=tX1hk1hntuXO4o8EEPq7KcV94r5f2JFYnMkFT33hsIqYmoiX2H/nE+kJa6x5JroeAM 28tXM7BJjirNoYcKoTJxP/sylzDtF1rK9eHdkDjLYfQp03pcAsD3dbcuCpvflYInwidr vSIXub2RYH//cNEjIYUpikBXtM7MFTBK/+2xkJfD6f1NtV537RiZQox0OFX8u8dgMncx t9kYSHCByBYbx/k9esKkVjqgHCXblLe2IkGCoKkw+RADDYNZZG6SKc8dY98h8SpO3Hxj 5cOiSiwAYmWtbL7tRLXj6Jkvne89ltbHV+fSjEIoo1hJzN664zB+X66KNih6UOqDpUgE 8b8A== X-Received: by 10.152.21.170 with SMTP id w10mr47294lae.24.1411601245512; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.5.169 with SMTP id t9ls218174lat.74.gmail; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.167.138 with SMTP id zo10mr1473091lbb.3.1411601244295; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si129497lbc.1.2014.09.24.16.27.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e; Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id l4so11461700lbv.5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.130.168 with SMTP id of8mr9112603lbb.5.1411601244205; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:27:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3D058966-CCF4-42A0-97CC-972F644E8D3C@yahoo.com> References: <5f6a7dec-3c5d-477d-bd73-5bd69726b713@googlegroups.com> <1411515475.42591.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1465cea2-41be-48ac-8f02-934d4a4b904b@googlegroups.com> <88e103a9-04e1-4739-97c2-f37fa457e4a8@googlegroups.com> <90cb23e1-0ed7-4b3c-9626-c31c4c8a8076@googlegroups.com> <1411567412.85594.YahooMailNeo@web181102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1411570426.39518.YahooMailNeo@web181106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1411574508.45917.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1411584109.21511.YahooMailNeo@web181104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <2E5BA45B-ACFB-46EA-8C84-881C50F095FE@yahoo.com> <518ED9C5-59EC-4A27-974C-5E88ED24F83B@yahoo.com> <1411598608.71845.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <3D058966-CCF4-42A0-97CC-972F644E8D3C@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:27:24 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Mathy person interested in concept, unsure where to begin. From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8c58b9b9be0503d80629 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7b3a8c58b9b9be0503d80629 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, 'John E. Clifford' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > As the mystics say, the way up is the way down. We won't get the way From > Lojban to logic right if we haven't worked out the other direction, because > only then can we be sure that Lojban has incorporated all the clues needed. > For me there's just no way one can get the FOPL to Lojban wrong, if one knows the very simple and trivial rules that apply. > In the examples here, some of the shifts are very secondary, but > deprenexification is surely essential > Deprenexification is needed for getting concise/ergonomic forms, but not to get the logic right in the first place. > (and dangerous, as you say, though this case is Ok apparently) and so is > this sort of collapse. The Principia to Polish shift and the logical moves > are just dressing. > The move is fine in this simple case. Getting the rule precisely right for the general case needs some consideration of several issues, but it's still one of the easy ones. But this is already part of Lojban->Lojban moves, not part of the FOPL->Lojban step, mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b3a8c58b9b9be0503d80629 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, 'John E. Clifford' via lojban = <lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:
As the mystics say, the way up = is the way down. We won't get the way From Lojban to logic right if we = haven't worked out the other direction, because only then can we be sur= e that Lojban has incorporated all the clues needed.

For me there's just no way one can get the FOPL = to Lojban wrong, if one knows the very simple and trivial rules that apply.=
=C2=A0
=C2=A0In the examples here, some of the shifts are very second= ary, but deprenexification is surely essential

Deprenexification is needed for getting concise/ergonomic = forms, but not to get the logic right in the first place.
=C2=A0<= /div>
(and dang= erous, as you say, though this case is Ok apparently) and so is this sort o= f collapse.=C2=A0 The Principia to Polish shift and the logical moves are j= ust dressing.

The move is f= ine in this simple case. Getting the rule precisely right for the general c= ase needs some consideration of several issues, but it's still one of t= he easy ones. But this is already part of Lojban->Lojban moves, not part= of the FOPL->Lojban step, =C2=A0

mu'o mi&#= 39;e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b3a8c58b9b9be0503d80629--