Received: from mail-wi0-f185.google.com ([209.85.212.185]:64990) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XXVhQ-0005er-3J for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:44 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f185.google.com with SMTP id z2sf892426wiv.2 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=40QI7Vt/lMNR+r4c5BTx9DW00+Pe/XI0zt2wRG5PrSc=; b=sQuF9mnARQn25jn/BX3uNIctSk4PK6HKVSza2dgulU5Oj/Yfe6SGM98FiIFcwOrrG5 moUXiEyEA0EKFZkbZSM2fcaf5sFy/tHZwWlz3OuzwrnZRZeNsp4Ig9dd++BaZ/5BNMqM BdzBBzf/vgNlp/veUcIlHFTalyRhSDYFoKdEi9fpzweVbxnN/eqELSFoCgYQEGam/8/L CiXiHhRkDefLejg6AN8UMdbg7k3tkMWsbgsWIo/U+JVGiHDxc2NqRVDD+019KW+SHmHo buiEntP8kc7NANVDP6QzPaqRN1IEcqOcTj4E3FN5hQtbhAya9vd/iKOsFaJYlEVP+tj1 y1gw== X-Received: by 10.180.92.234 with SMTP id cp10mr167797wib.18.1411738593256; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.76.143 with SMTP id k15ls119087wiw.33.canary; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.23.197 with SMTP id ic5mr499392wid.7.1411738592721; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si11935lbc.1.2014.09.26.06.36.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::229; Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u10so1107495lbd.28 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.18 with SMTP id s18mr20018706lal.68.1411738592577; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:36:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:36:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Tenseless predicates mean -able? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36724538c2a0503f80100 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c36724538c2a0503f80100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, TR NS wrote: > I just read section 3.8 of Loglan 1. In it JCB talks about how the > tenseless predictions entail the concept of *can*. For example, he gives > the word {ditca} as meaning "X teaches Y to W". Then he gives the example= : > > Da fu ditca > > Where "fu" converts the 1st and 3rd places. Translated into Lojban (which > has as different order) I think it is: > > da se ctuca > > JCB says it means "X is teachable" and goes on to reinforce the concept > that, lacking a tense operator, the predicate entails the meaning of *can= *. > Quote, "For in Loglan the fundemental thing about an object is not whethe= r > it *has* been eaten or taught, but whether it is the kind of thing that > *can* be eaten or taught." I see no mention of this idea in Lojban's > grammar, and in Lojban I would translate it as "X is a student". Those > translations are similar but certainly not the same thing. > > Did I miss something? Which is correct? > This is about modality, not tense. See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tense%E2%80%93aspect%E2%80%93mood for the distinction between tense aspect and mood, that Lojban tries not to conflate. Consider for example: ko'a pu ka'e se ctuca He was teachable. ko'a ca ka'e se ctuca He is teachable. ko'a ba ka'e se ctuca He will be teachable. It's interesting what the Wikipedia article on tense-aspect-mood says about creoles, because it seems to apply quite well to Lojban too: << Creoles, both Atlantic and non-Atlantic, tend to share a large number of syntactic features, including the avoidance of bound morphemes. Tense, aspect, and mood are usually indicated with separate invariant pre-verbal auxiliaries. Typically the unmarked verb is used for either the timeless habitual or the stative aspect or the past perfective tense=E2=80=93aspect combination. In general creoles tend to put less emphasis on marking tense than on marking aspect. Typically aspectually unmarked stative verbs can be marked with the anterior tense, and non-statives, with or without the anterior marker, can optionally be marked for the progressive, habitual, or completive aspect or for the irrealis mood. In some creoles the anterior can be used to mark the counterfactual. When any of tense, aspect, and modality are specified, they are typically indicated separately with the invariant pre-verbal markers in the sequence anterior relative tense (prior to the time focused on), irrealis mode (conditional or future), non-punctual aspect. >> mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c36724538c2a0503f80100 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, TR NS <transfire@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
I just read section 3.8 = of Loglan 1. In it JCB talks about how the tenseless predictions entail the= concept of *can*. For example, he gives the word {ditca} as meaning "= X teaches Y to W". Then he gives the example:

=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 Da fu ditca

Where "fu" conver= ts the 1st and 3rd places. Translated into Lojban (which has as different o= rder) I think it is:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 da se ctuca

JCB says it means "X is teachable" and= goes on to reinforce the concept that, lacking a tense operator, the predi= cate entails the meaning of *can*. Quote, "For in Loglan the fundement= al thing about an object is not whether it *has* been eaten or taught, but = whether it is the kind of thing that *can* be eaten or taught." I see = no mention of this idea in Lojban's grammar, and in Lojban I would tran= slate it as "X is a student". Those translations are similar but = certainly not the same thing.

Did I miss som= ething? Which is correct?

This = is about modality, not tense. See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/= Tense%E2%80%93aspect%E2%80%93mood for the distinction between tense asp= ect and mood, that Lojban tries not to conflate.

C= onsider for example:

ko'a pu ka'e se ctuca=
He was teachable.

ko'a ca ka'e = se ctuca
He is teachable.

ko'a ba k= a'e se ctuca
He will be teachable.

It's i= nteresting what the Wikipedia article on tense-aspect-mood says about creol= es, because it seems to apply quite well to Lojban too:

<<
Creoles, both Atlantic and non-Atlantic, tend to share a large= number of syntactic features, including the avoidance of bound morphemes. = Tense, aspect, and mood are usually indicated with separate invariant pre-v= erbal auxiliaries. Typically the unmarked verb is used for either the timel= ess habitual or the stative aspect or the past perfective tense=E2=80=93asp= ect combination. In general creoles tend to put less emphasis on marking te= nse than on marking aspect. Typically aspectually unmarked stative verbs ca= n be marked with the anterior tense, and non-statives, with or without the = anterior marker, can optionally be marked for the progressive, habitual, or= completive aspect or for the irrealis mood. In some creoles the anterior c= an be used to mark the counterfactual. When any of tense, aspect, and modal= ity are specified, they are typically indicated separately with the invaria= nt pre-verbal markers in the sequence anterior relative tense (prior to the= time focused on), irrealis mode (conditional or future), non-punctual aspe= ct.
>>

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c36724538c2a0503f80100--