Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24;
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:58:42 -0400
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
Message-ID: <20140927195841.GT28734@gonzales>
References: <20140927163121.GO28734@gonzales>
 <3c3b1c5e-cac2-42df-9d67-553a849789d3@googlegroups.com>
 <20140927192952.GS28734@gonzales>
 <bf1a257f-4b62-4d03-ad77-5bbfb1b91870@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b2ktwntdbf0dPnbx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bf1a257f-4b62-4d03-ad77-5bbfb1b91870@googlegroups.com>
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: burcu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--b2ktwntdbf0dPnbx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Saturday, 2014-09-27 at 12:40 -0700 - TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>:

> On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:30:26 PM UTC-4, Martin Bays wrote:
> > * Saturday, 2014-09-27 at 12:25 -0700 - TR NS <tran...@gmail.com=20
> > > On Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:31:55 PM UTC-4, Martin Bays wrote:=
=20
> > > Very cool!=20
> > >=20
> > > Could you explain some of the notation, e.g.=20
> > >=20
> > > non-veridical: FA x1. (gerku(f0(x1)) /\ srana(f0(x1),x1))=20
> > > EX x1. viska(f0(x1),mi)=20
> >
> > Yeah, there's quite a bit to the notation. But it outputs a lojban=20
> > version too, so you should be able to work out things mean by comparing=
=20
> > the logic with the lojban.=20
> >
> > To explain what's in your example:=20
> > FA is for all=20
> > EX is there exists=20
> > /\ is and=20
> > f0 is a function (glorked from context).=20
> >
> Thanks. That helps. Only the last one doesn't make sense to me. Is it=20
> something to do with `le`?

Yes. Here's a simpler example:

ro da poi verba cu prami lo mamta be da

FA x1:(verba(_)). mamta(f0(x1),x1)
FA x1:(verba(_)). prami(x1,f0(x1))

ro da poi ke'a verba ku'o zo'u li ma'o fyno mo'e da lo'o mamta da
=2Ei ro da poi ke'a verba ku'o zo'u da prami li ma'o fyno mo'e da lo'o


Here, we interpret {lo mamta be da} as a function from children to their
mothers; the first proposition expresses this, and the second is then
the main statement.

--b2ktwntdbf0dPnbx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlQnFvEACgkQULC7OLX7LNao0gCfdbPLGPbdk2iqIhdwMNaSeVnZ
wbQAoLd170y32AcKoBy7X2Ye3mKW9Ify
=c68c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--b2ktwntdbf0dPnbx--