Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24;
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:11:33 -0400
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] tersmu 0.2
Message-ID: <20140927211133.GW28734@gonzales>
References: <20140927163121.GO28734@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2eK_y-GR_ZV060QZr_779mNLSoT6K3BGkh_xhV4_9WQkg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QILrdhYozogw5Vly"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2eK_y-GR_ZV060QZr_779mNLSoT6K3BGkh_xhV4_9WQkg@mail.gmail.com>
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: burcu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--QILrdhYozogw5Vly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Saturday, 2014-09-27 at 17:53 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.=
com>:

> Very interesting!
>=20
> Is there any reason why selbri names have to become "la poi'i ... ku'o" in
> the final output? This may be ok for "lo", but I'm not sure it makes sense
> for "la", since now "poi'i" and "ku'o" are part of the name.

Oh wait, actually that's mostly just a stupid bug! What I said about
losing the original text is true, but it should only use {poi'i} in
complicated cases (e.g. when there are relative clauses involved), and
the terminator should be {kei} rather than {ku'o} anyway... not sure
what I was thinking there. Fixed. Thanks.

--QILrdhYozogw5Vly
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlQnKAUACgkQULC7OLX7LNaYRgCdGVccTCCMTME5VfrTyRjot/Lr
YJ4An3FAGcgWxm0ym8wuEaosDswwtjwK
=9npE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QILrdhYozogw5Vly--