Received: from mail-qg0-f63.google.com ([209.85.192.63]:41990) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYI5U-0003fK-Ro for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:49 -0700 Received: by mail-qg0-f63.google.com with SMTP id f51sf382908qge.8 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fmu8iHfc+JXmli4zr1r9TXbZKSIfhEoImkyQtUticaM=; b=GRTp5KtOqQG2bC09qigf/3ZpUW3CcedH3dmNKxkfLkpsJ19EPs9q0lC/SwQorTHyAg 1AqvIQlHUwazi9DLDCGURUAijfVTKjtooCrSk+dDHx4FcwaT8BZFEyna98GPJdUJJofY JTodaC79tpxnVWTf3Qs6Gdp3oYE6MMOt1WNeHmPbWUqhxdnDvq3q74F3A4hk7inCQYHB 3oO8GmJ1bjIWwmqbSAA6fGdK0QozMBnLLTcKmYmoc2MR0UjdrZAKD0AW5Vdx9IoDctPE bUEQUN8/gtBBHNIZsXrP7nDyum01EClHNZ4QMXQgh9nVe/WQF/n2R+44HwgQojasymJU aUug== X-Received: by 10.50.142.104 with SMTP id rv8mr941816igb.11.1411924598324; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.82.5 with SMTP id e5ls1715061igy.19.gmail; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.43.168 with SMTP id x8mr46587188igl.4.1411924597984; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pz1si653274pbb.0.2014.09.28.10.16.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c; Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id et14so1239125pad.17 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.126.9 with SMTP id mu9mr7752747pdb.151.1411924597808; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.37.198 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.37.198 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:16:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> References: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:16:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} From: And Rosta To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c362de1a25e705042350ea X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c362de1a25e705042350ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Assigning /voi/ to {poi'i} -- excellent stuff! I'm delighted to hear it's being used already. Rereading today some discussion from 12+ years ago, I see {se ka} was also proposed, subject to instigation of a convention for coercing added sumti places by addition of SE or FA. Is there a list of cmavo recycling proposals? I saw somewhere a proposal to recycle /du/, which I was initially a little consternated by, since {le du} had seemed very useful to me (as meaning unbound "he, she, it, they"), but I guess that could be got by {lo co'e}, with {co'e} meriting a monosyllabic form. --And. la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:43 PM, And Rosta > wrote: > I had misremembered {voi}. I mean rather that {le broda} is {lo co'e > voi'i ke'a broda}, where {voi'i} is nonveridical {noi} (I haven't > found an existing experimental cmavo for that in jbovlaste, but I > may have searched with insufficient diligence). {Voi} itself seems > utterly useless: has it ever been used correctly and meaningfully? > > I don't think it has seen much use at all. I'm sure the irci boys will > soon find a better use for it since they seem to be re-purposing all > those wasted one syllable cmavo like "tau", "lau" and such. > I might as well link to http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=new_voi You might recognize it as being basically {poi'i}, but shorter and without experimental shape. So far it seems there are already a few people who like new-{voi} and are already using it, possibly a bit timidly. I think a lot of potential changes have been prevented through peer-pressure in the past; people are being attacked and/or treated like outcasts when they do something different. I'm sure that if that weren't so, there would have been even more proposals and actual changes in usage (because less fear allows for more creativity). As for old-{voi}, I agree it's utterly useless. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c362de1a25e705042350ea Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Assigning /voi/ to {poi'i} -- excellent stuff! I'm d= elighted to hear it's being used already. Rereading today some discussi= on from 12+ years ago, I see {se ka} was also proposed, subject to instigat= ion of a convention for coercing added sumti places by addition of SE or FA= .

Is there a list of cmavo recycling proposals? I saw somewher= e a proposal to recycle /du/, which I was initially a little consternated b= y, since {le du} had seemed very useful to me (as meaning unbound "he,= she, it, they"), but I guess that could be got by {lo co'e}, with= {co'e} meriting a monosyllabic form.

--And.

la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e=
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:43 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com
<mailto:and.ros= ta@gmail.com>> wrote:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I had misremembered {voi}. I mean rather that {le broda} is {= lo co'e
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 voi'i ke'a broda}, where {voi'i} is nonveridical = {noi} (I haven't
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 found an existing experimental cmavo for that in jbovlaste, b= ut I
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 may have searched with insufficient diligence). {Voi} itself = seems
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 utterly useless: has it ever been used correctly and meaningf= ully?

I don't think it has seen much use at all. I'm sure the irci boys w= ill
soon find a better use for it since they seem to be re-purposing all
those wasted one syllable cmavo like "tau", "lau" and s= uch.

I might as well link to http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=3Dnew= _voi

You might recognize it as being basically {poi'i}, but shorter and with= out experimental shape. So far it seems there are already a few people who = like new-{voi} and are already using it, possibly a bit timidly. I think a = lot of potential changes have been prevented through peer-pressure in the p= ast; people are being attacked and/or treated like outcasts when they do so= mething different. I'm sure that if that weren't so, there would ha= ve been even more proposals and actual changes in usage (because less fear = allows for more creativity).

As for old-{voi}, I agree it's utterly useless.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c362de1a25e705042350ea--