Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.15;
Message-ID: <542860C7.2060006@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:25:59 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni}
References: <b15b8cb4-2f0f-45e4-b630-6480ed7d4654@googlegroups.com>	<CAO7tK2f76zV9SD36y4sNaAc+rAx_h6VYpyumgwPTYu43urOfJQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CACf3dPkzLyky2YMQfW-JF-tk+7b_LwMt6bwngZTBwym-1ov=vg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAO7tK2d+jG=uYH4Z+mMuW=CRmH=XnDSH0wZQBfgaguYDi97LPQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CACf3dPkmVs-vhaPMq1Gp23ze8hg3fmdDw-D8WurzCY4e8zPLwg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAO7tK2csEZWF3QqXMW7dnVx28yCt6GWe60buRHMSd5t1yyXSaw@mail.gmail.com>	<5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> <CACf3dP=vUzgG=+_5D3TyqbpBDSGTNg_5koH-3th_4DOFcW6ueA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACf3dP=vUzgG=+_5D3TyqbpBDSGTNg_5koH-3th_4DOFcW6ueA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

la .and. cu cusku di'e
> Assigning /voi/ to {poi'i} -- excellent stuff! I'm delighted to hear
> it's being used already. Rereading today some discussion from 12+ years
> ago, I see {se ka} was also proposed, subject to instigation of a
> convention for coercing added sumti places by addition of SE or FA.
>
> Is there a list of cmavo recycling proposals?

Off the top of my head, here are most of the re-assignments that have 
been considered (and I mean considered, not settled by any means):

ce'u -> ce
ke'a -> ki
tu'a -> tau
jo'u -> jau
du'u -> du
su'o -> sa / su
poi'i -> voi

And there is this proposal to replace good ol' never-used {soi}:

http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=new_soi

This proposal is quite popular actually (among those who know about it).

(I also have a secret proposal to assign the currently un-assigned cmavo 
{ja'u} to {na ka'e na} (also known as {bi'ai}).

> I saw somewhere a proposal
> to recycle /du/, which I was initially a little consternated by, since
> {le du} had seemed very useful to me (as meaning unbound "he, she, it,
> they"), but I guess that could be got by {lo co'e}, with {co'e} meriting
> a monosyllabic form.

What I would like even more is a better system of anaphoric pro-sumti 
and pro-bridi in general.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.