Received: from mail-la0-f62.google.com ([209.85.215.62]:55984) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYOuf-00078m-Oa for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:34:09 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f62.google.com with SMTP id pv20sf632987lab.27 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=yHzqduRKsN7P/3GnLXXIY7pAnaacsz7sf+KOr3oZLws=; b=NALxgeeL7ckzFqEG/OORWAKwrSzTptjor+qb+L1kRPg0CGujRmnkpP6YAcwEwtm4ep 0t6G3AoSbtdv96TvZAVlJUd3xoBXYIu9kZ5xpsOeBgcyULcN4jXNfbBZJmKl0tvi6ziJ y/NugXKtMIgkHNAg7FI2sPiNkZMgiNJc77mUKNS83u7SWMJM9mRjRWmwjJYbRSgNFVHL MF8o0NRnNHAOVwxm34raTfKedISbaRqRCSly7mH52ItS/f4PPV7Yl1lS+veCUhpkdjnX XTvmpfM1mKAzH3hwbG9fodeaieJgTiccU28CAsockZ2M0oYyjipHp2WH+YoD5dgVSq69 XTIg== X-Received: by 10.152.18.137 with SMTP id w9mr502lad.7.1411950834318; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.2.65 with SMTP id 1ls553150las.63.gmail; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.76.229 with SMTP id n5mr28564lbw.8.1411950832786; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si626385lbc.1.2014.09.28.17.33.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::235; Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ty20so4609897lab.12 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.22.100 with SMTP id c4mr17326398laf.0.1411950832698; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:33:52 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b542d2c9800504296ba3 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e0158b542d2c9800504296ba3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:33 PM, And Rosta wrote: > I don't know what having "nonspecific referents" is. If a specific > referent is one underdetermined by the description, is a nonspecific one > one that is fully determined by the description, e.g. a generic? > Nice. Is "underdetermined by the description" a common definition or test for specificity? I'm not sure it excludes generics though. In: "Certain things are better left unsaid." would you agree that "certain things" is +specific and +generic? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e0158b542d2c9800504296ba3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:33 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com= > wrote:

I don't know what having "nonspecific referents" is= . If a specific referent is one underdetermined by the description, is a no= nspecific one one that is fully determined by the description, e.g. a gener= ic?

Nice. Is "underdetermined by the descr= iption" a common definition or test for specificity?=C2=A0 I'm not= sure it excludes generics though. In:

=C2=A0"= ;Certain things are better left unsaid."

woul= d you agree that "certain things" is +specific and +generic?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e0158b542d2c9800504296ba3--