Received: from mail-ie0-f187.google.com ([209.85.223.187]:51382) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYRTC-00086H-6u for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:58 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f187.google.com with SMTP id x19sf2772687ier.14 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hLHhly7TsIc/UwcGg4TwlsyqZBFHmK8S0Nh4anqycf0=; b=tMoRoj1UL4+pr5aRkNuhHNWaNl/Y9PxDZpolIJNv1EBEDtdDMXu3GCYmvZg/yOqpPu S3C8xhGvRg2SDrMxY8JKg+m4OEx6UESowsNYXxT4joKSC8D8bQ6sZ/ZjxPqa1EjQcm23 CtecUumFH6JKESnRwdEHN+hjKPWXM1Ruo4/167S/Qr3kQeEaRSoF+xS7KR3v5zBTLot4 e2/uygqj8oNrVYCIa9Y7MUp6y11ZcMcGuOtRmj09rVXDKIYwcbiVIQhh3jPyCoFDl3UV HURH0BKnsieeJ2KJN7Gi4ckPFsKLNH11qpa1HI1mTnu70MOwmrB1C8vJUqrptkyhm7/r jaGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hLHhly7TsIc/UwcGg4TwlsyqZBFHmK8S0Nh4anqycf0=; b=ikJfGyDnfJUO6p/cZ6/nQLRnPrpI2HIXSO1lPGZc30IwSV1jLaCTQBE/oERPouqFHB PZhFCHSvDt3vsseusmhpWLoplRmAz7G1e67U5uPNk+dsnw+6r9mn3enkR4zfC6spnYfB Z2k16runv6i1qjnC39MUOZCEptJKnte6+kET/fpr/6M5M3qnVCI/VmlVv7+WvHxvWCkF JlUmtjx/RsGNXPxGpNYko3N7FY8b8VUqQP25DRpvJUvtObmkRfjApCBjDL+HHRFBCb+x HDr8iwv8wahzmnKNGMenK+FW/61LHw2aCyIritKDofbWB15D2bFDzo2S7uo5yz6fia7g xDcA== X-Received: by 10.140.93.79 with SMTP id c73mr12qge.9.1411960663615; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.92.167 with SMTP id b36ls105181qge.88.gmail; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.30.36 with SMTP id c33mr361392qgc.2.1411960663380; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:17:43 -0700 (PDT) From: la durka To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <957408e7-c827-4460-bf97-4a85642f29c7@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: New soi's scope MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2639_191962517.1411960663141" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_2639_191962517.1411960663141 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The reason for making it that way (the term "scope leaper" has been used)= =20 was precisely to provide a way to escape the normal left-to-right scoping= =20 rule, to make certain things easier to express without rearranging the=20 entire sentence structure. A similar proposed bridi modifier (xoi as=20 currently defined in jbovlaste) is right-scoping like tags. la selpa'i has some discussion in the second half of this post=20 . mu'o mi'e la durka El domingo, 28 de septiembre de 2014 20:37:55 UTC-4, And Rosta escribi=C3= =B3: > > I've just noticed that new soi "always takes top scope". Why is that? Not= =20 > knowing the discussion that led to that choice, I incline to the view tha= t=20 > in a reformed Lojban there would be a new syntax that syntacticizes the= =20 > left-to-right scope rule (so that clause structure is binary branching, a= s=20 > in Xorban), in which case you'd expect soi to scope over what it precedes= .=20 > Most if not all tags (e.g. tense) could be seen as abbreviations of soi= =20 > phrases, and hence you'd expect soi phrases to have the scopal properties= =20 > of tags. > > --And. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_2639_191962517.1411960663141 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The reason for making it that way (the term "scope leaper"= has been used) was precisely to provide a way to escape the normal left-to= -right scoping rule, to make certain things easier to express without rearr= anging the entire sentence structure. A similar proposed bridi modifier (xo= i as currently defined in jbovlaste) is right-scoping like tags.

la = selpa'i has some discussion in the second half of this = post.

mu'o mi'e la durka

El domingo, 28 de septiembre de = 2014 20:37:55 UTC-4, And Rosta escribi=C3=B3:

I've just noticed that new soi "always takes = top scope". Why is that? Not knowing the discussion that led to that choice= , I incline to the view that in a reformed Lojban there would be a new synt= ax that syntacticizes the left-to-right scope rule (so that clause structur= e is binary branching, as in Xorban), in which case you'd expect soi to sco= pe over what it precedes. Most if not all tags (e.g. tense) could be seen a= s abbreviations of soi phrases, and hence you'd expect soi phrases to have = the scopal properties of tags.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_2639_191962517.1411960663141--