Received: from mail-yk0-f187.google.com ([209.85.160.187]:62476) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYWo9-0001KD-Gz for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:57 -0700 Received: by mail-yk0-f187.google.com with SMTP id 200sf285635ykr.14 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=81mA8Xh88CU8X5tgZpu8ckvKSqYHCAhuIF7uejYkZas=; b=xtQZiyRkgwdhBzCw2qWzNdBTCqsv+hznBRfI4lt8rtmOojKhZBSJDYCixmzwQuxsFg DGSKCOTAPh1Z2zWil41+LaZVTAHK/F8W/LPQsbR7to3/D/LjsTnxvwWGihE1pyKe2tK1 I2EZLQVYDgr8ylewbNgdB59Cbf20y793NMdiH9Sc0/CnivipCyRyvpTtAOTofnfVElSu xf9Pjfm6sHzCHmecEHy3mcenLLcPheMfphersLB0QQMh8q4SS6cuvs51XTnhXrsSVvjE xTdJnEcm7G2GSNJrHQQmezg7FLvwehIXqETwKMSOW+60vOffXdzHBfwAVx/xtrgQv2CN edEw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=81mA8Xh88CU8X5tgZpu8ckvKSqYHCAhuIF7uejYkZas=; b=kPJm3yXaXdtJXKH+xRMYmCJUTBLqa/UaWod+AW7x8QTP/ySUg3JGBhnrA33U6CDsaV JQjhjhl47PxPAnZdntbMJsBK08g0stkZhPo9c8UufyVUwnlSdHY3E/Lfuf9K9vFtq0d5 vAuqbyTmavjcq9JcIBhnT3ZMhOKKflVBC+cipdSsfecZir6onmszrMTChT8Vlv3ihPFs p2ytaVS+VZdfHVVlhkt7N3MHV07cx8B/UZFWXLNk1N8DTIGsjPjIbWf1PBb7HMYQyMTM gwCIln6JE9lSFn4GCXd0C5Lj7sfmKM/AAMdiMRgt+FMk1Aeb6e5qUdkizSky50G0QJL5 pHhw== X-Received: by 10.140.105.53 with SMTP id b50mr414774qgf.3.1411981183166; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.93.38 with SMTP id c35ls1828599qge.92.gmail; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.95.113 with SMTP id h104mr311qge.36.1411981182923; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:59:42 -0700 (PDT) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <957408e7-c827-4460-bf97-4a85642f29c7@googlegroups.com> <47666b9a-5ea7-4f43-b5c4-b72399ba47bb@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New soi's scope MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_195_1204977132.1411981182240" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_195_1204977132.1411981182240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Monday, September 29, 2014 4:24:47 AM UTC-4, And Rosta wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2014 04:45, "TR NS" > wrote: > > > > On Sunday, September 28, 2014 11:17:43 PM UTC-4, la durka wrote: > >> la selpa'i has some discussion in the second half of this post. > > > > > > Thank you, so much. THAT is an explanation. I finally understand {voi}. > > > > So, where as {poi} is an "identifier", narrowing down the possible > identity of the referent, {voi} is a "qualifier". It doesn't restrict the > identity, but selects the quality of the referent that makes it pertinent. > Another translations besides simply "as" might be "in so far as". > > That is a different proposal than the one for using /voi/ for {poi'i}, > which is the one you hadn't understood. > Wait, that's a different "new voi" proposal? And both proposed by la selpa'i? > It struck me as quite reasonable and understandable that you, newish to > these topics, didn't understand that proposal, but not that you blamed the > proposer for that. > Am I reading that right? Instead of explaining, you are taking the time to rub my face in it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_195_1204977132.1411981182240 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, September 29, 2014 4:24:47 AM UTC-4, And Rosta = wrote:


On 29 Sep 2014 04:45, "TR NS" <tran= ...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 28, 2014 11:17:43 PM UTC-4, la durka wrote:
>> la selpa'i has some discussion in the second half of this post. >
>
> Thank you, so much. THAT is an explanation. I finally understand {voi}= .
>
> So, where as {poi} is an "identifier", narrowing down the possible ide= ntity of the referent, {voi} is a "qualifier". It doesn't restrict the iden= tity, but selects the quality of the referent that makes it pertinent. Anot= her translations besides simply "as" might be "in so far as".

That is a different proposal than the one for using /voi/ fo= r {poi'i}, which is the one you hadn't understood.

Wait, that's a different "new voi" proposal? And both proposed = by la selpa'i?
 

It struck me as quite reasonable and understandable that you= , newish to these topics, didn't understand that proposal, but not that you= blamed the proposer for that.

Am I reading that right= ? Instead of explaining, you are taking the time to rub my face in it? = ;

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_195_1204977132.1411981182240--