Received: from mail-wi0-f192.google.com ([209.85.212.192]:43315) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYZyf-0002Yi-6D for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:57 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f192.google.com with SMTP id ex7sf256150wid.29 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wPDItYeucILsb9B1tLZ0BBej9smRWLmVutuQwKIHF34=; b=p+gC9Sxz8uWzIPZJSEsWyU5wSJQ3tWaA3ffVSlco8sTNPjx2qAfs/C3qrra/+apSZe wF+x3Cv2wCleGnvLa4ixTfRlB1RkQ9EK3SpahX8t+YtA1QPyZLIueZSROQP4vWj6dFaM IaYjTVWI2q4hihjgDRbc/gPd7MFV9AnUafOQqCIaNDFo1KWNYpFBqTCLRSrSpkuQZxsy BtYUXCMY6WdL2Off0eDQapR83Gb3G7GyVBBldNuhzTSPB2NtTvYb98ZL9KvHuRBrqsUP czkGDCTMJ1EB2Nc7gQLw3fHJiyfV3EMutz7N+zs2UPdqq12D0VCOwo04jkWrHE5GnHlC SM7A== X-Received: by 10.181.11.225 with SMTP id el1mr228452wid.14.1411993366113; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.198.103 with SMTP id jb7ls485312wic.25.gmail; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.28.169 with SMTP id jp9mr6026708wid.6.1411993365534; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fa3si817621lbc.0.2014.09.29.05.22.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::229; Received: by mail-lb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u10so4456698lbd.28 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.118.227 with SMTP id kp3mr36251189lbb.75.1411993365422; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> <4004291.GPfs8n1fLZ@caracal> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:22:45 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd921b4f8a69f0504335223 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7bd921b4f8a69f0504335223 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, And Rosta wrote: > > On further consideration, I agree it's not useless. But > > (1) For every relative, noi, poi, ne, pe, no'u, po'u (that list from > memory -- hope it's right) a nonveridical counterpart would be at least as > useful as voi--poi is. > There's also "po" and "po'e", with no non-restrictive counterparts. Neither of them is used much, and when "po'e" is used, it can almost always be more perspicuously replaced by "be", since it's usually things like "lo xance po'e ko'a" instead of "lo xance be ko'a". "ne" is also not used much.) I suppose a nonveridical version of "no'u" (which is short for "noi ke'a du", would be short for "noi ke'a kinda"? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bd921b4f8a69f0504335223 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:

On further consideration, I agree it's not useless. But

(1) For every relative, noi, poi, ne, pe, no'u, po'u= (that list from memory -- hope it's right) a nonveridical counterpart = would be at least as useful as voi--poi is.

There'= s also "po" and "po'e", with no non-restrictive cou= nterparts. Neither of them is used much, and when "po'e" is u= sed, it can almost always be more perspicuously replaced by "be",= since it's usually things like "lo xance po'e ko'a" = instead of "lo xance be ko'a". =C2=A0"ne" is also n= ot used much.)

I suppose a nonveridical version of= "no'u" (which is short for "noi ke'a du", woul= d be short for "noi ke'a kinda"?=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bd921b4f8a69f0504335223--