Received: from mail-la0-f57.google.com ([209.85.215.57]:46446) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYeFL-0004DJ-3Y for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:33 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f57.google.com with SMTP id s18sf279941lam.2 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkd4eo4QYpD3qlJRGuQw/eQwhtdlSNcBQf9MDmi0Xrw=; b=s8PP4bBZve3upSYz8/uCMnW8VDatr/RWNccgRbaZgFBQSfMxFPifbtnbWQBnJgcB3o WtQvZpbcBPtPeyUJU2pR6l1Ak8hEyDHKMKx0xwIKmk7grbymVNKkfYqzjZS6V464zCZH cujuUFQl1Rd7QI4M1ExZkBo76WJFv8fOMw95eU7t7hiZID/Dvaa7vouSNuVkE4TZPtPf QSobWZJxY9+V/1YgMjTI9VQR6DPhSrL8SnLz8RxgxGcB15X/GJD4yeMjmaU+NhD0YpB6 hvARX4/T+544OfKLHs/sy9LhTuwiOPg+LLIVy8ax2g+zJqCXtolDEVeI8FJKa06DRRnf Pl+A== X-Received: by 10.152.21.99 with SMTP id u3mr16092lae.39.1412009775917; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.246.35 with SMTP id xt3ls574509lac.67.gmail; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.182.8 with SMTP id ea8mr655319lbc.11.1412009774879; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9si375082wib.2.2014.09.29.09.56.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e; Received: by mail-wi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id cc10so485323wib.13 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.79.232 with SMTP id m8mr14341775wix.64.1412009774754; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.208] ([2.31.159.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fa20sm12293590wic.1.2014.09.29.09.56.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54298F49.8000708@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:56:41 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120711 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} References: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> <4004291.GPfs8n1fLZ@caracal> <54295019.6010707@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <54295019.6010707@gmx.de> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - selpa'i, On 29/09/2014 13:27: > la .and. cu cusku di'e > I think the whole notion of veridicality and non-veridicality is overstat= ed. Yes, it is overstated in CLL, early teaching materials, and Lojbab-level un= derstanding of gadri, but it is nevertheless not insignificant. > For the definite description nature of {le}, which is its main > purpose, non-veridicality is irrelevant, and it would more likely to > be defined in terms of quantifiers in a formal logic. On the contrary, the description, with its identificatory function, is nonv= eridical; to put it another way, it has independent illocutionary force of = an identification, not an assertion; it is not part of the propositional co= ntent of the main sentential illocution. > Instead of {lo broda voi brode} you can always say {lo broda noi/poi > mi skicu ke'a fo lo ka brode} and {noi simlu lo ka brode}. Almost. But you need to sort out the illocutionarity. Is there a UI for 'he= reby'? What'd be good would be a ko-like version of mi, meaning "I hereby",= such that the bridi it is a sumti of expresses an independent illocution: = {lo broda noi/poi mi HEREBY skicu ke'a fo lo ka brode} > As this is something that is relatively rarely needed, it doesn't > matter that it doesn't have a shortcut cmavo. It comes prebaked into le- gadri, but for any other identificatory phrase i= t's needed. E.g. for something like "the day of the week that we got marrie= d on", referring to Tuesday (without claiming we got married on Tuesday), "= lo day-of-the-week identificatory-poi we got married on ke'a" -- much as Pi= erre's orangutan example. Without it, you lose a bit of needed functionality, but you don't wreck the= (putative) logical foundations of the language. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.