Received: from mail-oi0-f55.google.com ([209.85.218.55]:42244) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYvpW-0006VD-0x for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:43:00 -0700 Received: by mail-oi0-f55.google.com with SMTP id a141sf117839oig.0 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=subject:references:from:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z7knuKHF1ji4LzZbY8G6fbUmRZRYDtTq08chmS92wjs=; b=jpafB40MpMTQMI0h/ShUpgYPXZ6VlmEvMYatp4Qa44RPdp2TMj90scxYoVp1xtwTZP OExBuRy4l0J6agVsfbtB/5mHKkAXDcVuso6cLvOEkv6SUH4fWwx1zq01vzA/nv3JoAEc 6E+pl7V3bsrVJnIPEAbJ4bVqd0lsMse9sZ9CcrSeLboYnoxZCZrFQeF+YVcxoi/PZ1Vg jmLkDzcBscvWN6u5Tget6jSFZnGlpW8rg8M5QhwBxrbRlzNPNTGZT7Gn8dpVNeEEzW59 HRiPF1Raec99SQ1Z27s4VM76FJAx8WdsuIVaZZwcLeZMz6E4Id4nDd2+cvc34WvqDBip ywng== X-Received: by 10.50.30.38 with SMTP id p6mr78468igh.8.1412077368040; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.50.233 with SMTP id f9ls158897igo.44.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.22.197 with SMTP id g5mr44113126pdf.6.1412077367787; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm21-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm21-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com. [98.138.91.114]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4si1050269igp.3.2014.09.30.04.42.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 04:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.114 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.138.91.114; Received: from [98.138.226.176] by nm21.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Sep 2014 11:42:47 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.125] by tm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Sep 2014 11:42:47 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Sep 2014 11:42:47 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 360654.56044.bm@smtp204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Mtbd9p0VM1kDPcnWV5p4T7DJCQbz1b2HT4B5FyBfHBlvF0Y zG2lvfJn13G8uv7QFzCR4ZRcGLWwo2bh32M61Pm52EzOktWLBT7elM2WJ1_B I9x7nfuahm4iMSEfGLQgwvl8YzP8qQsGg4pvfR212.qmGMckju10tBwFQEux wH0kyfSEr34UdlVwPMUNhFEP2lIx8Bll9SUoiFO_rV91lYgDUJYspJdcNY.0 6JgeQVkCzcZw2oTyzNmcy3CaqUhjkM90tlIYcg7MG5xMlM8njDpsRvvpfmPy iR144LzWLPnYdthsUHFGc.7WfjaLXFWhfzfPJ_9TdpzjS3_uV9NSZbf3_XXB TBudSXNArCRAQw1SRR3Me_tFAlkEu_1gcuVE21eDByVC.mozUpxkoMwpdrml __K.UYplcm.stTQ3xK8amR8FK0H4UzMlH8iCpaQUo2euzT1y5KoUIKjxnyuM x9Hd4VTSOFUfuwUcgz9dHbPQDQslNrAhcXnlzDjvBqyOgb.9NPbKe4tu0XJF Y8EEvZyVwYE48fuQpAtL.ARsYxFGvt8kdE6zojAlZo1lO3OdBA0oNS2ny.e1 ezrvkbsLXnmf3E5deaRXOWXp0ys.AtMVcxGNYtBp287riMJGUzwdfDuQryce xS0F9DmO1fPDsTjNDnz80KIiEvf.ILx8XjYuw6x2oqs5isV2UsuWceI8deNI 3nvloVz9RpzeQ4FQ5Z3rGC9mIk9lSz2qQcEs_vkx6 X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} References: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> <4004291.GPfs8n1fLZ@caracal> <54295019.6010707@gmx.de> <54298F49.8000708@gmail.com> <5429A27F.1040906@gmx.de> <542A6562.80902@gmail.com> <542A80D4.3050504@gmx.de> <542A8770.7060104@gmx.de> <980FE8B2-F165-48EB-A2A9-997208C95201@yahoo.com> From: "'John E. Clifford' via lojban" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: <980FE8B2-F165-48EB-A2A9-997208C95201@yahoo.com> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:42:45 +0200 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.114 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Original-From: "John E. Clifford" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_bar: / Note btw that nothing in Logjam corresponds to Russell's description semant= ically, though {Lo} is of the same syntactic type. Sent from my iPad On Sep 30, 2014, at 13:37, "'John E. Clifford' via lojban" wrote: > Well, this spoils my fun somewhat, since I just finished offline a piece = that began "The big mistake is taking {le} to be like {lo} rather than like= {la}, though Logjam history and pedagogy force that view.". The logical f= orm of {le broda cu brode} is Fa, where're 'a' is a constant term, with no = internal structure. Notice that, like {la .broda. brode} we cannot infer t= hat some broda is a brode or that the referent is a broda or even that ther= e is a broda, all of which follow immediately from .{lo broda cu brode}. = Whatever connections there may be between the predicate used and the thing = referred to are matters of psychology or sociology but not of Logic. I don= 't mean that {le} collapses to {la} (or conversely), since the connection b= etween predicate and object are typically different in the two cases and th= e difference may be practically important in figuring out what is referred = to 6but, of course, it may also not help at all). The point is that once w= e turn from trying to figure just how {le} is different from {lo} -- the po= int of this discussion -- to how it differs from {la}, we can do a bit more= useful work with a lot less quibbling (I.e., do some science rather than P= hilosophy). >=20 > Sent from my iPad >=20 > On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:35, selpa'i wrote: >=20 >> mi pu cusku di'e >>> As I'm not a {le}-user myself, I don't think I'm going to try to put my >>> definition on it. Let the {le}-users define what it means. >>=20 >> Although, if {le} is defined as a name, then the other definition I show= ed is available to define {lo}. Then there would at least be a much clearer= difference between the two gadri. And maybe it would make PC happy, too: {= le} is a name, and {lo} takes the maximal bunch of brodas :) >>=20 >> mi'e la selpa'i mu'o >>=20 >> --=20 >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.