Received: from mail-wi0-f186.google.com ([209.85.212.186]:52979) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XYxz1-0000Hu-Qg for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:56 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f186.google.com with SMTP id fb4sf304671wid.3 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PnX4CGiZolKoyH4jZDd2uyDSUXMfrIpo2NXtmxqhtAA=; b=RiqKYY1kXYNNNVU8WF5CxwQ0tm5W595GbnxJyqHDSX84LgHdQeEPulPLrs9cjKEM/2 OCDCiuQYiH4YvTwdeQuB/asYI8twlm2jA27zr8Ty3j785hR/wdcwCxiFvs3SuzUk4p1T ftFYURhcIir6MRfraYHoAnY7hAjErO25kmgXDNn/ldu2+vUsHBw3tMPU4lPnUJhbh89k LvCVVQiCG8YXqmeUe65X2g7XXyrAaUggGcMEXEsexXfB+ULCF0vTxtJyNxOQqmn85Tu4 zFRClkD+xtZaLutOQgUlAMWs1tSMpZQxlh/NF2mNBfe6vg+bTYuuJk/1wkdtEX9GJnLp yvMA== X-Received: by 10.152.25.193 with SMTP id e1mr6013lag.28.1412085644530; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.5.73 with SMTP id q9ls42821laq.27.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.151.3 with SMTP id um3mr543353lbb.15.1412085643931; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fa3si1323625lbc.0.2014.09.30.07.00.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b; Received: by mail-la0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id gb8so10674018lab.16 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.118.227 with SMTP id kp3mr44061294lbb.75.1412085643830; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <542A8770.7060104@gmx.de> References: <5427DCE6.9020900@gmx.de> <4004291.GPfs8n1fLZ@caracal> <54295019.6010707@gmx.de> <54298F49.8000708@gmail.com> <5429A27F.1040906@gmx.de> <542A6562.80902@gmail.com> <542A80D4.3050504@gmx.de> <542A8770.7060104@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:00:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd921b43169b8050448cfa0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7bd921b43169b8050448cfa0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:35 AM, selpa'i wrote: > > Although, if {le} is defined as a name, then the other definition I showed > is available to define {lo}. Then there would at least be a much clearer > difference between the two gadri. The reason a Russell type quantifier is not quite right for "lo" is that we don't want "naku lo broda cu brode" to be true just because there are no brodas. The Frege/Strawson analysis is more in line with "lo", I think: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definite_description That's the reason for "noi" in the definition, we don't want the description to share the illocutionary force of the claim, it has to be a presupposition or something like that. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bd921b43169b8050448cfa0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:35 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

Although, if {le} is defined as a name, then the other definition I showed = is available to define {lo}. Then there would at least be a much clearer di= fference between the two gadri.=C2=A0

The r= eason a Russell type quantifier is not quite right for "lo" is th= at we don't want "naku lo broda cu brode" to be true just bec= ause there are no brodas. The Frege/Strawson analysis is more in line with = "lo", I think: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definite_description

That's the reason for "noi" in the definition= , we don't want the description to share the illocutionary force of the= claim, it has to be a presupposition or something like that.=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bd921b43169b8050448cfa0--