Received: from mail-qc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.216.191]:38041) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XZ1oR-0004A9-3e for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:06:15 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f191.google.com with SMTP id l6sf774587qcy.28 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Bw4itf3fYUylwbclmRtFRypOPrUOOVJ/KIaoerY3EmI=; b=PJLYrAKdePpTURqE6BTeZKYW0I9zCwXKNeYJK1SaG86nsOUWfOyjlAP88cDzGKwey2 QBOofiW8scBGIqwfFhvZuZigNT4QKb1iGmTjIIhfz0l7twSeXfvMushn1m3rR8Zhrcoq bF3M1Sg9IV5uuhJ2O35/L2nDmBF4jPBVUd4bCtCAf2E7DGm/Isyg928iLOVAgsy+4OXC jT9e9xGBvzJ3gxugMMCmYz28iimz3PGtWWDh+DwXeE5warAI0C7JnEmUywSvNqo+wqXE uFmg7wP2ncswNgGvmmZyyKQMIzLSgaaLsh+wdIJV13j0AcidrIFJD4bmHIx7dkoUWL5R 7k9A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Bw4itf3fYUylwbclmRtFRypOPrUOOVJ/KIaoerY3EmI=; b=FNi4cL2yMSbXR80748IG1B33Vj7ur9q88oNv1oJ8b/1T/0oN0gAAzpxGh10+FndG94 TUTX9yyy3cvdW/Q+fueajISG4Q5h7c63yU7figWRpdQdJILK/2fIgnjjus62iXYSLwTi BlBLNqi8XOy52W+JPsnMxEdxxPttQ7M/kyGq0eeQzhNQaojadNIY7ZWJ0RvzdUeeFnrV kmcuiee9WDSCVbezSdkaWOsfNOXAG3CyxX3ap2eeocU7ki69uGg9lEk+Oq5hL1DEXupI JfKcQEewazXd5kdm7jukgih5qzEYFGM+cacHqvDWDa+elpBxddBeoBfDmMg5nfXfV787 X0OQ== X-Received: by 10.140.92.110 with SMTP id a101mr12695qge.23.1412099659889; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.23.5 with SMTP id 5ls235285qgo.54.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.104.144 with SMTP id a16mr309qgf.42.1412099659567; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:54:18 -0700 (PDT) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <20f1747b-2b63-4352-942e-de295621203a@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: {le} as an anaphorical particle MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_695_1626802044.1412099658642" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_695_1626802044.1412099658642 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:25:19 AM UTC-4, la gleki wrote: > > It is in no way a proposal but just a thought mildly based on former usage > > > http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=%27%27%27le%27%27%27_as_an_anaphorical_particle > > For other proposals regarding {le} with full explanations add here: > http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=le > If one mentions something that is not in any previous utterance, does "look up" fall back to context? And beyond that if there is no clear referent, then is the thing presupposed? To clarify, if I said out of the blue, "le xirma cu bajra", do you just presuppose some horse exists? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_695_1626802044.1412099658642 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:25:19 AM UTC-4, l= a gleki wrote:
It is in no way a proposal but just a thought mildly based on former usage=


For other proposals regarding {le} with full explanations add here:&= nbsp;http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=3Dle

If one mentions something that is not in any previous = utterance, does "look up" fall back to context? And beyond that if there is= no clear referent, then is the thing presupposed? To clarify, if I said ou= t of the blue, "le xirma cu bajra", do you just presuppose some horse exist= s?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_695_1626802044.1412099658642--