Received: from mail-pa0-f63.google.com ([209.85.220.63]:53298) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XZ9hi-0000uv-J4 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:51 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f63.google.com with SMTP id bj1sf25671pad.18 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=S1KINFuDHuTw7ieGC9zEIZRLxAcRovZK9FhEELxAFj0=; b=LISxxXp3oIzO38/+fisq9IuVIe5kBmnqQTAFH/JS01EKMsTK38aQ8N2Vo+koyocoxD u8ahrKzZc9lmFNFLRJNicfWad2h+KnF6YhgRw4JZ6spvDMQwOc/bOLl4S9HacxzoGUC3 2/f8iesIoaZl4bUPObO7yw4yxqFj11X/iKU+9g6eks1aN7lFYAYBDHdFwU/mLTHN/hFJ D7OLOquhxSmmxjIEvxNdiQpasr6osE34Ca/PyUzAhUKHDD9Z4H6U9H0XbLFNyGCdlZcY 5NdOu7a31VIzT9dlgVNpTJ1eJXqRu9nKVtujQFYIThtbGy9XsNQ+1bq16+rNWYPdotnh DY4g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=S1KINFuDHuTw7ieGC9zEIZRLxAcRovZK9FhEELxAFj0=; b=oo33OrzO/2LDFznWs54Xh1pad+45H0GXQInvp/Bp69/8cuYcKNXeWoALAEHdSilEW0 tNJhg8HzdTppYaXsBK+MsKuS4U6n9aoaDJzuFT8e30HGGs4omLTBZ8n2uYMsZy1A3AEY 8JSE9X6ysEcEHD/yWk3p5gQ0sFBSQYaxDPYiEIlQLPeEXcItUCHt/p0NzsO3G13FBZan yT1wkJNw5Xo3Q0Ml2b+JhLjwaX6THQBMHcsYlvxccnXwd5wJGkN5EaKePZtA1R9TGJfq MRb0r8PFoprBf4mroTslaap8PKXHH1prOjiIB+I4qiUehrwf3KNRA/IeConDhyk2B3UG i8uQ== X-Received: by 10.140.96.54 with SMTP id j51mr291qge.13.1412130700225; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.46.102 with SMTP id j93ls294861qga.30.gmail; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.39.39 with SMTP id u36mr36040qgu.8.1412130699944; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:31:39 -0700 (PDT) From: la durka To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <34b2a9f0-7ccb-4135-8795-7038cc996b42@googlegroups.com> <41aea447-a409-4218-abb4-f5f40d056d67@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Speaker specificity: {.i da'i na vajni} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4957_216757044.1412130699420" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_4957_216757044.1412130699420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm confused, because you seem to be complaining that loi/lei invokes a=20 Platonic form instead of grouping some individuals "all together" into a=20 mass, but the latter _is_ exactly what it does. The platonic form may or may not be captured by lo'e/le'e (seems reasonable= =20 to me, though ba'anai it's a contentious point). The cmavo you were looking for is {lu'o}. mu'o mi'e la durka El martes, 30 de septiembre de 2014 22:08:25 UTC-4, TR NS escribi=C3=B3: > > > > On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:52:19 PM UTC-4, TR NS wrote: >> >> rather I expect there to be another word that means "all together", for= =20 >> argument sake say "ro" means that, so "ro lo" would be what I'd use. >> >> =20 > Actually that should be "ro le", to mean "the". > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_4957_216757044.1412130699420 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm confused, because you seem to be complaining that loi/= lei invokes a Platonic form instead of grouping some individuals "all toget= her" into a mass, but the latter _is_ exactly what it does.

The plat= onic form may or may not be captured by lo'e/le'e (seems reasonable to me, = though ba'anai it's a contentious point).

The cmavo you were looking= for is {lu'o}.

mu'o mi'e la durka

El martes, 30 de septiembr= e de 2014 22:08:25 UTC-4, TR NS escribi=C3=B3:


On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:5= 2:19 PM UTC-4, TR NS wrote:
rather I expect there to be another word that means "all toge= ther", for argument sake say "ro" means that, so "ro lo" would be what I'd = use.

 
Actually = that should be "ro le", to mean "the".

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_4957_216757044.1412130699420--