Received: from mail-ee0-f62.google.com ([74.125.83.62]:52917) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XZD95-0002Dm-P4 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:21 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f62.google.com with SMTP id c13sf11620eek.7 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Q+7NoXX/bBUP6GEw9wbjruCQpK7z/VS6fjYjVWkuPeE=; b=QfFUjXIOOR5kQhNcV4U4ZbSZqyKuXhqXY1Z+FVgjNHOuqHuoTnORj9zpEtaJ8cvtlN g0qRA4chTclBYy7wTJ/XBBIlCF5wDMJ08hdjWnnm4gn3x//cSnkYWqXeaT76H+pdoHDj P3ONQXjz7wnV1X228S+Z+q42LXKAozhM9eq1aUJbQS79mIj+vLfWRcl2VjoaxWNE3Kqq iy6VxvRk7ulGYVCGHmAEf+BntYYKWfGZjWQ9mpWrgaW8N+2vIrySol9ksm4XGhB9s/ed QvS3rSDhqBJHDy7+hQo0hGIh1j90TtLknE95I8n9O5RFotKJ/vJPDqTgwcEoYv4XGeRb VCaQ== X-Received: by 10.180.9.114 with SMTP id y18mr64779wia.21.1412143928584; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.108.194 with SMTP id hm2ls804663wib.26.canary; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.109.67 with SMTP id hq3mr2139945wib.1.1412143928100; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id go4si33835wib.3.2014.09.30.23.12.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::235; Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi2so635201wib.8 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.84.193 with SMTP id b1mr11664416wiz.25.1412143927981; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.175.167 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:12:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:12:07 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {le} as an anaphorical particle From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0437450132fe1005045661dc X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d0437450132fe1005045661dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-09-30 19:30 GMT+04:00 Gleki Arxokuna : > > > 2014-09-30 17:46 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gleki Arxokuna < >> gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It is in no way a proposal but just a thought mildly based on former >>> usage >>> >>> >>> http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=3D%27%27%27le%27%27%27_as_an_anaph= orical_particle >>> >> >> Why "ka'e"? In: >> >> la djan cu cusku zo coi la meris .i le cusku cu gleki >> >> do you want "le cusku" to refer to la meris, since la meris ka'e cusku? >> > lo nu pilno lo misno rarbau would tell me that probably selbri should hav= e > precedence over sumti. but the proposal is not yet fully formalised. if y= ou > have any thoughts to complete it please do. > Forgot to add about {ka'e}. Well, yes. Probably {ca'a/pu'i} might be more relevant here. I meant {ka'e} to refer to semantic inclusion of SELBRI in {le SELBRI} into another selbri in the context or in the current/previous text. Consider {la djan cu cusku zo coi la meris .i le bacru cu gleki} Would {bacru} refer to {cusku}? Clearly, those are edge cases since the most common usage of {le} would be {le fetsi} for "she" and similar. > >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n >> email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d0437450132fe1005045661dc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-09-30 19:30 GMT+04:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@g= mail.com>:


2014-09-3= 0 17:46 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gleki A= rxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
It is in no way a proposal but just a thought= mildly based on former usage


Why "ka'e"? In:

=C2=A0 la dj= an cu cusku zo coi la meris .i le cusku cu gleki

d= o you want "le cusku" to refer to la meris, since la meris ka'= ;e cusku?
lo nu pilno lo mi= sno rarbau would tell me that probably selbri should have precedence over s= umti. but the proposal is not yet fully formalised. if you have any thought= s to complete it please do.

Forgot to add about {ka'e}. Well, yes. Probably {ca'a/pu&#= 39;i} might be more relevant here. I meant {ka'e} to refer to semantic = inclusion of SELBRI in {le SELBRI} into another selbri in the context or in= the current/previous text.
Consider

{la= djan cu cusku zo coi la meris .i le bacru cu gleki}

Would {bacru} refer to {cusku}?

Clearly, th= ose are edge cases since the most common usage of {le} would be {le fetsi} = for "she" and similar.



mu'o mi'e x= orxes
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d0437450132fe1005045661dc--