Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ba207325-7391-4fc6-ba0c-8a939967fdfe@googlegroups.com>
References: <20141001075910.GU14210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
	<ba207325-7391-4fc6-ba0c-8a939967fdfe@googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:40:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP=UV6rL7Zi-5WA5q5LCwzb29LG9oitEd_89=w_Fi-X92g07-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: CLL: I'd like to drop the formal grammars.
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d55819042005045f2911
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--047d7b33d55819042005045f2911
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The book is commonly used as a tool by nintadni, for whom the formal
grammars aren't helpful in the last - but pe'i the existence of a formal
grammar is part of what makes Lojban Lojban, and the primary purpose of the
CLL is to be a reference grammar. I like the suggestion of keeping only the
shorter of the two, and updating to the PEG in v2.0, but i ultimately see
the English text as an explanation of and supplement to the formal grammar
rather than vice versa.

- mi'e .kreig.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7b33d55819042005045f2911
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">The book is commonly used as a tool by nintadni, for whom th=
e formal grammars aren&#39;t helpful in the last - but pe&#39;i the existen=
ce of a formal grammar is part of what makes Lojban Lojban, and the primary=
 purpose of the CLL is to be a reference grammar. I like the suggestion of =
keeping only the shorter of the two, and updating to the PEG in v2.0, but i=
 ultimately see the English text as an explanation of and supplement to the=
 formal grammar rather than vice versa.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"> - mi&#39;e .kreig.</p>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7b33d55819042005045f2911--