Received: from mail-la0-f56.google.com ([209.85.215.56]:40894) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xb7or-0003Hc-9P for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:25 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f56.google.com with SMTP id pv20sf439094lab.21 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=MIcNme/jfRzzBboLyMazzTn63Grd+1gZWZnwb6UzwkE=; b=ccFx2Dc/9tPd9oBIrzna/injBlfv5MURK2zxgHE84i7wHCDXI3P4pjRRyMDwCOhL87 yp54bbimVRwPsU0ZoCKjY4bYPp22LhsyleFZjUhcyYVky9xz3DfFvFl1YAW5M2ms61BE Srs0axKGrFP8gAm03WY7Q0dEELezTB9983kvgURux9qjA+9a5MctudqoRS/M3sz56Y2c y5MegXvzWSGerVoG0kycCjKDkGwAULpSKiBq7dID2IVoLnuzMe/PY6jy0iWNzV7OgDOE +98CsbZz1pMAFjF53OwH5sMS1Jd6AtzAW/jANReplsusqPAx6ibmxtMdjroHS65hPlwQ GYkA== X-Received: by 10.180.9.114 with SMTP id y18mr54264wia.21.1412600110104; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.103.73 with SMTP id fu9ls554935wib.10.gmail; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.188.52 with SMTP id fx20mr992512wic.3.1412600109594; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si1422311lbc.1.2014.10.06.05.55.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d; Received: by mail-la0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q1so4308003lam.18 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.166.6 with SMTP id zc6mr22152555lbb.31.1412600109507; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 05:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.70.34 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.70.34 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 05:55:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5349359c-f884-4976-a3e1-b0610eabeff6@googlegroups.com> <20140928013358.GB28734@gonzales> <20140928152915.GB7320@gonzales> <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:55:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: And Rosta To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3874abcaae50504c0975e X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c3874abcaae50504c0975e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5 Oct 2014 23:38, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas" wrote: > The presupposition is that when you use "lo plise" there's something you are talking about, and that something is identified by their satisfying the predicate "plise". What sort of identification is this? It sounds like you're saying lo is definite, and attributing to it the sense I had understood le to have, with nonveridical description? I'd understood {lo plise cu plise} to be necessarily true, but you seem not to, yes? So {lo broda cu brodu} is not equivalent to {zo'e ge broda gi brodu}? If this is already covered somewhere else on wiki or in archives, just point me to it. And --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c3874abcaae50504c0975e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 5 Oct 2014 23:38, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas" <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> The presupposition is that when you use "lo plise" there'= ;s something you are talking about, and that something is identified by the= ir satisfying the predicate "plise".

What sort of identification is this? It sounds like you'= re saying lo is definite, and attributing to it the sense I had understood = le to have, with nonveridical description?

I'd understood {lo plise cu plise} to be necessarily tru= e, but you seem not to, yes? So {lo broda cu brodu} is not equivalent to {z= o'e ge broda gi brodu}?

If this is already covered somewhere else on wiki or in arch= ives, just point me to it.

And

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c3874abcaae50504c0975e--