Received: from mail-vc0-f185.google.com ([209.85.220.185]:36733) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XbzjX-0008F9-8Y for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:27 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f185.google.com with SMTP id hy4sf9924vcb.22 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=4pzmCK4NcCNBkLnJKgRFRxhDNu87ErVgHkWYqCH4vdg=; b=c6YXnqnVpIp9/8TMdUrcZKEakMyr7x7jrTplrUuMGm25+LAKrnfOWwmBu4ffpKLrTE Iii/B/iG13EfAqZZWbVxMjGmIF/gf87OXw9Uxv+YvrowZUad3imtTg91Ix4fVUPVAcpK AvRrxfD3Jx3ehxcKFmXJhjk9D6eFf1oA+vmkeU7s2nJWlStUH0UpxwHQhCViclapwv9J LslWtVNYAkawhim1Y5+LF6ZL92TLwnCnkBe0uZ68b9vjsOqSGkgqJV1xPQwMnxhTJ82K FEcHqc3d3My8fsmaIVT/BT+o8AjunUaZIGZiDCRrVjZ6Z8HnB95fgkU0IBNxtTtxeTvn VCWg== X-Received: by 10.140.19.2 with SMTP id 2mr636qgg.35.1412807356606; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.102.237 with SMTP id w100ls57151qge.35.gmail; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.174.166 with SMTP id x26mr8613610yhl.30.1412807356265; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.24]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy3si246525igb.3.2014.10.08.15.29.15 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24; Received: from thegonz.net (d24-141-9-29.home.cgocable.net [24.141.9.29]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s98MT4AM019970 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:29:05 GMT Received: from martin by thegonz.net with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XbzjG-0006DZ-4y for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:29:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:29:06 -0400 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {da poi} (was: Re: tersmu 0.2 Message-ID: <20141008222905.GE18854@gonzales> References: <20140928160229.GD28734@gonzales> <20141004141748.GH32481@gonzales> <20141005154837.GB1974@gonzales> <20141006030238.GF1974@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: jdini User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Monday, 2014-10-06 at 19:28 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Martin Bays wrote: > > * Sunday, 2014-10-05 at 15:03 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas > > What value does "ko'a" get in "su'oi tadni poi sruri su'o dinju zi'e = goi > > > ko'a"? Or for that matter in "su'oi tadni goi ko'a", or in "no tadni = goi > > > ko'a"? I think that's the value that the noi-clause should be about. > > > > Well... in all cases, I just have ko'a binding to the variable, so that > > doesn't help at all! >=20 > How about in "ko'a goi su'o tadni cu broda" or "ko'a goi no tadni cu > broda"? The same; I take the order to matter only in edge cases like {ko'a goi ko'e} where both are already bound - then ko'e gets bound to the value of ko'a. > > (so I have e.g. {ro broda goi ko'a brode ko'a} -> > > {ro da poi broda cu brode da}, and {ro broda goi ko'a du .i ko'a du} > > being an error.) >=20 > Is it an error because you don't admit unassigned "ko'a" i.e. is "ko'a du" > by itself an error? Or is it an error because "ko'a" was at some point > bound to a bound variable, and that makes that variable unusable until it > is cleared with whatever the cmavo for clearing it was, which I can't > remember now? Yes, I have it staying bound to the now-unbound variable, hence the error. So e.g. donkey sentences like {ro tercange poi ponse su'o xasli goi ko'a cu darxi ko'a} are errors. --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQ1urEACgkQULC7OLX7LNaXiACeM6aASKRHXAqPatDY7rWB+Vs5 gigAn29k0oahO76+gqt+2VkhWw/hjelW =tdNc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY--