Received: from mail-la0-f63.google.com ([209.85.215.63]:60623) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc0Vf-0000H9-UO for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:19:14 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f63.google.com with SMTP id ge10sf7490lab.18 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6j9Ylw/jLifz8L+Afv+L+LCiUHSppWcUDZrtdS5U3fU=; b=RKe9LsJFhQLBygehOt+3UeKB9+kOtjl+SJHG2Pny854IdbT9rOMlpMA4oVkhq1pfDW E1prAdU229ChAnpWV3gHrYogQiYQsN+Ek/uixZyXDaYqe/Vj5eWW5PyNMuF8O2/SOJ/N fb+m87Qy9aUKb0TpCqBqnJ3SHx3RozqRfWaplJ7Px1RC2gjxEDUXzhRL5T2szJhKXt5i j1Bdex8MUqJqyXYr3l7v/LpPJ1Xt+XWx9mDKRnUP3sZqKh405FzG13Bayc7tbbe92wXe aSBJVgRMsGHXFJiZHMhhCmFPcmIaaxw7JatFXk53PSdLxBiaXp7usRFn60ZFU3jzXelV JtnA== X-Received: by 10.180.126.103 with SMTP id mx7mr7747wib.10.1412810339468; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.95.168 with SMTP id dl8ls993163wib.35.canary; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.188.52 with SMTP id fx20mr3418379wic.3.1412810339081; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rb5si257834lbb.0.2014.10.08.16.18.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d; Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q1so110649lam.4 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.8.9 with SMTP id n9mr14639743laa.2.1412810338959; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.176 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:18:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1412802488.55250.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <5349359c-f884-4976-a3e1-b0610eabeff6@googlegroups.com> <20140928013358.GB28734@gonzales> <20140928152915.GB7320@gonzales> <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <5433F201.2020902@gmail.com> <5434EA6C.9090507@gmail.com> <1412802488.55250.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:18:58 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3674863862b0504f18afd X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c3674863862b0504f18afd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > So, insert the definition into its proper place: {lo broda cu brode} = > {ze'a noi broda cu brode}. This latter is a tautology, since {ze'a} always > refers to a thing which makes the predication true. > I don't think that's the right definition for "zo'e". If zo'e made any sentence in which it appears true, it would be hard to express anything but platitudes in Lojban. You would be forced to fill every place of every predicate you use in order to say anything meaningful. "zo'e" gets its referents from the context, but it is not necessarily something that will make the sentence in which it appears true. Finally, a practical note. Whatever the point of all this is, dealing with > MEX now is bad idea. Given that the creators of Lojban don't know how MEX > works and, to a great extent, don't even know how it should work, trying to > explain it now is a thankless task foreddomed to failure. Eventually, when > you have a successful theory (of whatever sort you are working on) for the > core of Lojban, you will be in a position to apply that theory to MEX to > explain how parts of it work and to criticize and guide the development of > other parts. Hopefully. But not now and not yet as a part of e\developing > that theory. > I tend to agree, but since some MEX are used in the parser expansions, we either need to understand what they mean or replace them with more suitable expansions. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c3674863862b0504f18afd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:
<= /blockquote>

=C2=A0So, insert the definition into its proper = place: {lo broda cu brode} =3D {ze'a noi broda cu brode}. This latter is a tautology, since {ze'a} always refers to a thing which makes the predication true.

I don= 9;t think that's the right definition for "zo'e". If zo&#= 39;e made any sentence in which it appears true, it would be hard to expres= s anything but platitudes in Lojban. You would be forced to fill every plac= e of every predicate you use in order to say anything meaningful.
=

"zo'e" gets its referents from the contex= t, but it is not necessarily something that will make the sentence in which= it appears true.


=
Finally, a practical note. Whatever the point of all this is, dealing with MEX now is bad idea. Given that the creators of Lojban don't know how MEX works and, to a great extent, don't even know how it should work, trying to explain it now is a thankless task foreddomed to failure. Eventually, when you have a successful theory (of whatever sort you are working on) for the core of Lojban, you will be in a position to apply that theory to MEX to explain how parts of it work and to criticize and guide the development of other parts.=20 Hopefully. But not now and not yet as a part of e\developing that theory.

<= div>I tend to agree, but since some MEX are used in the parser expansions, = we either need to understand what they mean or replace them with more suita= ble expansions.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c3674863862b0504f18afd--