Received: from mail-ee0-f60.google.com ([74.125.83.60]:52094) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc2Mb-00017S-Sf for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:18:03 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f60.google.com with SMTP id e51sf34300eek.15 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GYr++dviju5FLAdgth+J+IT75lNOHxdiWXklrmPYyhE=; b=h/bYp8RvxWdI5AHRRJgPLmF334j4bJzWCyFJp7vd8O71nElLWXncURGcXqIcx1UwyX ld3JuOULzi9d3rviQ51ZsMCWgudg22crnB6zeO6QM5qEyWofW20cxNxDvgAeuUl2Mers o1Wql3bJsrOGGjTnz9w6Zj4b+BcWQyGJyqBmZ+1VJ3RjVM8/ZWN6E2xG7NmHLU92MoSg wPGCc/MLd0ZiEBNGvYVEQ6JXvTyzCjwvLhT6t7Fau5b6Avcam4Q0zk/w4ApeAGt/gbev VNiCRmVzz3kpLa4rPbdfmeyWjmVtn+jmuKd23SbwjIkewB9/oDZ6S6z6rDeHovobDd66 EwOQ== X-Received: by 10.152.8.15 with SMTP id n15mr609laa.32.1412817466571; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.21.4 with SMTP id r4ls120299lae.24.gmail; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.1.136 with SMTP id 8mr919312lam.5.1412817465408; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si259262lbc.1.2014.10.08.18.17.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::234; Received: by mail-la0-x234.google.com with SMTP id hz20so214666lab.25 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.18.130 with SMTP id w2mr9832470lad.64.1412817465307; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.176 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <20141005234958.GD1974@gonzales> <20141006025048.GE1974@gonzales> <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales> <5435BEB8.5050303@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:17:45 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149413626f8900504f3335a X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e0149413626f8900504f3335a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 PM, selpa'i wrote: > >> I.e. we cannot easily say "three students are surrounding the building" >> without bringing in a dummy {lo} that only serves to give us a plural via >> inner quantifiers (even though there is no referent we wish to refer to). >> > It's not *that* bad: > > {.i su'o da ci de poi tadni zo'u da gunma de gi'e sruri lo dinju} > Or more concisely: "su'o gunma be ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju", "a group of three students surrounds the building". But that's cheating a bit, since we are singularizing rather than using plural quantification. Maybe plural quantifier "su'oi ci" could be defined as: su'oi ci broda cu brode := su'oi da poi broda zo'u ci de poi broda gi'e me da zo'u da brode Then we can say "su'oi ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju". "There exists an X and three students Y such that X has Y as mass elements > and X surrounds the building." I am not sure whether one must explicitly > state {da ci mei} in this situation, but of course we can do that if needed. > I would say "lo gunma poi sruri lo dinju cu pa mei .i lo se gunma poi sruri lo dinju cu ci mei" mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e0149413626f8900504f3335a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.c= om> wrote:
On = Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote= :
I.e. we cannot easily say "three s= tudents are surrounding the building" without bringing in a dummy {lo}= that only serves to give us a plural via inner quantifiers (even though th= ere is no referent we wish to refer to).
It's no= t *that* bad:

{.i su'o da ci de poi tadni zo'u da gunma de gi'e s= ruri lo dinju}

Or mor= e concisely: "su'o gunma be ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju", &quo= t;a group of three students surrounds the building".

But that's cheating a bit, since we are singularizing rather th= an using plural quantification. Maybe plural quantifier "su'oi ci&= quot; could be defined as:

=C2=A0su'oi ci brod= a cu brode :=3D su'oi da poi broda zo'u ci de poi broda gi'e me= da zo'u da brode =C2=A0=C2=A0

Then we can say= "su'oi ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju".

"There exists an X and three students Y su= ch that X has Y as mass elements and X surrounds the building." I am n= ot sure whether one must explicitly state {da ci mei} in this situation, bu= t of course we can do that if needed.
<= div>
I would say "lo gunma poi sruri lo dinju cu pa mei = .i lo se gunma poi sruri lo dinju cu ci mei"

= mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e0149413626f8900504f3335a--