Received: from mail-wg0-f64.google.com ([74.125.82.64]:52076) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XcMEx-00038x-V9 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:24 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f64.google.com with SMTP id k14sf204630wgh.9 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9r0xQBQR1FAyg7u0+uL2Og1fkFmKx9d80XW4PqdxPy4=; b=YfwuIFlWSERY7/KAyxrawWlcHRHuR0SkXHdx3UcsL2pfdwum6j/5Q+jmWUe6EGFauh n/8XUfvyJkS/7FQe7/8LbibQsEBkcOdbXXSM6oQGLXiPI9YUUfIHO/cNLZxex3V01IcD QJpc/QfJFHUGJlNmMdELesFhQhsFIF1rG/EzGdO3RLiCptTJ4fvpDRBX/A+zixbHtAtO Gt8hNRRUDa2O5CzvhVfSyX0e4Bg/sdS7dqcBVQ0/Af6AxKQeMh2y61j/1qto5jFgfSOz fFsOjVlPT4I66NgQsNRHQc4C/mKZ0Vqy0prOq3g3NqSDAfcPh740Iqh9CU9tp0gckDVM MSoQ== X-Received: by 10.152.7.7 with SMTP id f7mr7288laa.4.1412893872897; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.115.207 with SMTP id jq15ls249256lab.49.gmail; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.220.8 with SMTP id ps8mr89287lbc.5.1412893871653; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rb5si38002lbb.0.2014.10.09.15.31.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e; Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id gi9so2152786lab.19 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.9 with SMTP id r9mr434539lae.73.1412893871558; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.176 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1412871334.88429.YahooMailNeo@web181106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <5349359c-f884-4976-a3e1-b0610eabeff6@googlegroups.com> <20140928013358.GB28734@gonzales> <20140928152915.GB7320@gonzales> <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <5433F201.2020902@gmail.com> <5434EA6C.9090507@gmail.com> <1412802488.55250.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412861205.15295.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412871334.88429.YahooMailNeo@web181106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:31:11 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d202451d586050504fd29 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e013d202451d586050504fd29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:15 PM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Okay, not exactly a tautology, but failing in a particularly questionable > way. That is, {zo'e brode} is false (or, at least, not true) just in case > there are no brode, in which case {zo'e} is referentless, to the disgust of > Griceans and the puzzlement of logicians. > I don't think that's how "zo'e" works. Sentences with "zo'e" must be able to be false, otherwise sentences with "zo'e" are not very informative. Consider questions, for example. If someone asks "xu da zvati"? "Is anyone at?" can the question be at all meaningful? It can only be meaningful if the zo'e in zvati2 can have a value, one obvious from context, possibly "here" or whatever other relevant place we had been talking about. If we must understand "zo'e" to mean "the value that makes the sentence true", then the only answer we could truthfully give to that question is "go'i", but that wouldn't be at all informative to the questioner. Sure, there is almost certainly a value for "zo'e" that will make "da zvati zo'e" true, but that's not what the questioner wants to know. The value of "zo'e" is a value obvious from context (or unimportant), but not necessarily one that will make the sentence true. In most cases the sentence will be true, but not by virtue of the value of zo'e being determined by that, but rather because in most cases assertions are true or at least intended to be true. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e013d202451d586050504fd29 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:15 PM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Okay, not exactly a tautology, but failing in a parti= cularly questionable way.=C2=A0 That is, {zo'e brode} is false (or, at = least, not true) just in=C2=A0case there are no brode, in which case= {zo'e} is referentless, to the disgust of Griceans and the puzzlement = of logicians.

I don'= t think that's how "zo'e" works. Sentences with "zo&= #39;e" must be able to be false, otherwise sentences with "zo'= ;e" are not very informative.

Consider questi= ons, for example. If someone asks "xu da zvati"? "Is anyone = at?" can the question be at all meaningful? It can only be meaningful = if the zo'e in zvati2 can have a value, one obvious from context, possi= bly "here" or whatever other relevant place we had been talking a= bout. If we must understand "zo'e" to mean "the value th= at makes the sentence true", then the only answer we could truthfully = give to that question is "go'i", but that wouldn't be at = all informative to the questioner. Sure, there is almost certainly a value = for "zo'e" that will make "da zvati zo'e" true,= but that's not what the questioner wants to know.

=
The value of "zo'e" is a value obvious from context (or = unimportant), but not necessarily one that will make the sentence true. In = most cases the sentence will be true, but not by virtue of the value of zo&= #39;e being determined by that, but rather because in most cases assertions= are true or at least intended to be true.=C2=A0

m= u'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e013d202451d586050504fd29--