Received: from mail-la0-f63.google.com ([209.85.215.63]:38069) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XcMc5-0003Py-2H for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:20 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f63.google.com with SMTP id ge10sf193767lab.18 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zehfGhUKRNJ5EVQ+dwJJFA3e1xGnBGR6xlZHE5cBgyQ=; b=xaQ73mgjB1YMpbk6OLDcnHubDyDDE2keVS8mNH4VRd59f4sVuInwGGYtCwMBrbBkbQ JpASG62rleZhdcZRPgPyFhpwPn5zPgH6lrPwAz2lXOH8f2HzSCe5eUuJ2XeoPxUVspWx ltNK71OMB8xa9s458yncVKxI0cAuIFtkAlcXzCM6RwR+iz7aX/7gDF95JLvPGPYUseVd PzbzzvjGzZoCBvdHvdDWNmMjXrujw+A5PYdThQZrT6Gz42xnukrnuGI6PYCtbfzwzZx6 xMEJO88ji5jf2vy9kiv5DcbkyKJu2Zuc/IMQZyRJwfYe0EEtC0uqKxIUFnv/S/mtC7Tx 8zLw== X-Received: by 10.152.29.98 with SMTP id j2mr4582lah.41.1412895305731; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.88.13 with SMTP id bc13ls221897lab.21.gmail; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.145.136 with SMTP id su8mr107749lbb.9.1412895304623; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rb5si43330lbb.0.2014.10.09.15.55.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e; Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so2054102lbv.5 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.169.37 with SMTP id ab5mr415653lbc.27.1412895304523; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.176 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:55:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5436730B.9040101@gmx.de> References: <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <20141005234958.GD1974@gonzales> <20141006025048.GE1974@gonzales> <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales> <5435BEB8.5050303@gmx.de> <5436730B.9040101@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:55:04 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34b4abb2822050505528a X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- --001a11c34b4abb2822050505528a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:35 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e > >> >> Then we can say "su'oi ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju". >> > > If {su'oi} is to parallel {su'o}, then I would expect {su'oi ci} to mean > "at least three" as a plural quantifier. > Perhaps, but that could also be "su'oi su'o ci". I would read "su'oi ci" as "some three", which is not exactly the same as "some at least three". "su'oi ci prenu cu casnu lo tcima" would mean that at least one of the discussions about the whether involved exactly three people. But maybe {su'oi je ci} "at least one and three" makes sense for the exact > plural 3. It's a bit hackish though, because it connects a plural with a > singular quantifier. > > Another option is to have a new PA that marks a PA string as plural. > Some singular quantifiers have more than one plural version. The plural version of "ro" for example can be ro'oi = naku su'oi naku, roughly "any number of" or "any", but it could also be the one that picks everything together, roughly "all".. And yet another option is to take plurals as the default. That could be useful at least for most quantifiers, since they are often inadvertently used like that anyway. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c34b4abb2822050505528a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:35 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:
la .xorxes. cu cu= sku di'e

Then we can say "su'oi ci tadni cu sruri lo dinju".

If {su'oi} is to parallel {su'o}, then I would expect {su'oi ci= } to mean "at least three" as a plural quantifier.

Perhaps, but that could also be "su'oi su= 9;o ci".

I would read "su'oi ci"= ; as "some three", which is not exactly the same as "some at= least three".

"su'oi ci prenu cu ca= snu lo tcima" would mean that at least one of the discussions about th= e whether involved exactly three people.=C2=A0

But maybe {su'oi je ci} "at least one and three" makes sense = for the exact plural 3. It's a bit hackish though, because it connects = a plural with a singular quantifier.

Another option is to have a new PA that marks a PA string as plural.

Some singular quantifiers have more than one = plural version. The plural version of "ro" for example can be ro&= #39;oi =3D naku su'oi =C2=A0 =C2=A0 naku, roughly "any number of&q= uot; or "any", but it could also be the one that picks everything= together, roughly "all"..

And yet another option is to take plurals as the default.
=
That could be useful at least for most quantifiers, since th= ey are often inadvertently used like that anyway.=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c34b4abb2822050505528a--