Received: from mail-ee0-f60.google.com ([74.125.83.60]:55258) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XcP0T-00055G-Kf for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:39 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f60.google.com with SMTP id e51sf230212eek.5 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=HlPhLRV+AAN0+h0nEytaOAc6B/8UHJzgTpgiYGitdNo=; b=kBudaaMUcihl4Y+qUw6WUSHDfEtFpDy1+tirUUD05/U67JuMCAHgnJ37GPvRouIkKm qimexEapWZ7T6nfhTefzqZ651JckJ5zHsPO2E4nJjlIUUwcX9l4DJR/PmaVxkogPvO0V nkzfzXxu+pIDiFpmA7nQWiKRDF2LA9Xh8nMTeTcBooqm15AkKiKCQcZ4ITsQ408QqXMm qiCZzxeeFYrmFO+622ZZ21e6v1+VSbhOMVzPU+GldHQqML4CHRJwhX9EUqzLOQlzUvNB Cf4udP+Jvpcqj5r60LyLsQcsH8NS95FUS8NMGp5Nu17MJgCF40O3gnMVC+X+NDC0n/Qz AtAA== X-Received: by 10.180.126.103 with SMTP id mx7mr15048wib.10.1412904506655; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.81.227 with SMTP id d3ls43314wiy.7.gmail; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.76.230 with SMTP id n6mr359530wiw.0.1412904506297; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si79435lbc.1.2014.10.09.18.28.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::229; Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id pn19so2312349lab.14 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.55.7 with SMTP id n7mr1086338lbp.16.1412904506193; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.176 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:28:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54372122.1010806@gmx.de> References: <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <20141005234958.GD1974@gonzales> <20141006025048.GE1974@gonzales> <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales> <5435BEB8.5050303@gmx.de> <5436730B.9040101@gmx.de> <54372122.1010806@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 22:28:26 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d11e317c3405050777a3 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c3d11e317c3405050777a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:58 PM, selpa'i wrote: > > Indeed (Toaq Dzu has both as distinct words). I take {ro'oi} as the dual > of {su'oi} (naku su'oi naku). The other one would be "the highest > number". My impression so far has been that "any" is much more common > than "all". "All" is mostly necessary when counting cardinalities (e.g. > "All shipmates together were seven in number"), where "any" would fail. Or "It took all shipmates to lift the cannon." This kind of generalization is the one we're thinking of for the cardinal numbers. Basically the plural version of PA would correspond to "su'oi da poi PA mei". That's also probably what we want for the so'V series, rather than the other variety. The exception would be "no" that only has the other generalization, "naku su'oi". I just think that plural quantifiers would make more sense in a language > with plural reference. Right now Lojban has a strange mix of singular and > plural predication. We can talk about the students who are surrounding a > building, but can't claim that some students are surrounding the building > without bringing in proxy sets or masses (or experimental cmavo). Definitely worth considering. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c3d11e317c3405050777a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:58 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:

Indeed (Toaq Dzu has both as distinct words). I take {ro'oi} as the dua= l
of {su'oi} (naku su'oi naku). The other one would be "the high= est
number". My impression so far has been that "any" is much mo= re common
than "all". "All" is mostly necessary when counting car= dinalities (e.g.
"All shipmates together were seven in number"), where "any&q= uot; would fail.

Or "It took all shipm= ates to lift the cannon."

This kind of genera= lization is the one we're thinking of for the cardinal numbers. Basical= ly the plural version of PA would correspond to "su'oi da poi PA m= ei". That's also probably what we want for the so'V series, ra= ther than the other variety. The exception would be "no" that onl= y has the other generalization, "naku su'oi".

<= /div>
I just think that plural quantifiers would make more sense in a language wi= th plural reference. Right now Lojban has a strange mix of singular and plu= ral predication. We can talk about the students who are surrounding a build= ing, but can't claim that some students are surrounding the building wi= thout bringing in proxy sets or masses (or experimental cmavo).

Definitely worth considering.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c3d11e317c3405050777a3--