Received: from mail-la0-f63.google.com ([209.85.215.63]:38995) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xchow-0005UV-Iq for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:59 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f63.google.com with SMTP id ge10sf390464lab.18 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9PQGgRK7zRc7Q5E2ayLKwFmFa57QgohdsaAJSqoOHvU=; b=zDm8hRdbcnesCh4RIzftopi+/jqPqDMz3VhPyWPadPX0rOvOo0cD38t21uqks0cCnS x300CC73kaMnMT0b017lhwLMsHgGHkhNiCcdaCMl/pSbj+fDjdYlnLFIqWtoTt8urUYz BPgxfj8fcjbZwhrwudXfaV3VajZXCrCYpnAi57gMI2b5Y5jNiieuR+vmO3Gi7XbU7v9l E/esv/CQxJaarlr8kIhuyYiTBDH0inA8XJQd7MYnQ/51Dfa7oYCSGaCvr2PPmaIGQjbT JZ7zL5tT6xYwGz6ibYqeg06Ei8SfarbcVzDv60HwXrraxNoLsbPVTEk+iP9M7akwsvqK 8YOQ== X-Received: by 10.152.36.71 with SMTP id o7mr30737laj.29.1412976827192; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:47 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.115.207 with SMTP id jq15ls368812lab.49.gmail; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.4.4 with SMTP id g4mr1444485lag.2.1412976826154; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us10si515591lbc.1.2014.10.10.14.33.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e; Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so3849853lbv.19 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.161.70 with SMTP id xq6mr7319907lbb.49.1412976826057; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.107 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:33:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1412944837.7070.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <5349359c-f884-4976-a3e1-b0610eabeff6@googlegroups.com> <20140928013358.GB28734@gonzales> <20140928152915.GB7320@gonzales> <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <5433F201.2020902@gmail.com> <5434EA6C.9090507@gmail.com> <1412802488.55250.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412861205.15295.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412871334.88429.YahooMailNeo@web181106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412904403.17231.YahooMailNeo@web181104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412944837.7070.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:33:45 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25944cb08450505184d2e X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c25944cb08450505184d2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:40 AM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > So, assuming that we have a new {zo'e} (here "xxx"), we could equate {lo > broda cu brode} with {brode xxx poi broda}, where the {poi} makes puts the > {xxx} in the right slot ({broda}, not {brode} -- or, at least, before > {brode}). > So xxx would refer to everything in the universe of discourse, and "poi broda" is a restriction to just those things that satisfy "broda". Yes, that would work too. At the cost of introducing a new KOhA that refers to everything in the universe of discourse, of course. > This also has the advantage of getting away from making descriptions > assertive, as {noi} seems to do. Of course, it leaves the question of why > this equation is of interest. > The original reason for coming up with a paraphrase was probably something like this: "lo" logically needs as an argument a proposition with (at least one) free variable, which is bound by "lo". But syntactically "lo" only has a sumti-tail as its dependent. and a sumti-tail is not flexible enough for many purposes. For example, to show the underlying logical structure of "lo mamta be re da" it is useful to be able to export the quantifier to a prenex, which a sumti-tail does not provide. There are different workarounds to this limitation. One is to introduce the new cmavo "poi'i", which converts a bridi, with a marked free variable, into a selbri which is just what we need for a sumti-tail, now we can rewrite "lo mamta be re da" as "lo poi'i re da zo'u ke'a mamta da". "xxx poi" would also serve: "xxx poi re da zo'u ke'a mamta da", and "zo'e noi" also serves the same purpose. The main and probably only advantage of "zo'e noi" over the other two is that it doesn't use any unofficial cmavo. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c25944cb08450505184d2e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:40 AM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:
So, assuming that we have a new {zo'e} (here "x= xx"), we could equate {lo broda cu brode} with {brode xxx poi broda}, = where the {poi} makes puts the {xxx} in the right slot ({broda}, not {brode= } -- or, at least, before {brode}). =C2=A0

So xxx would refer to everything in the universe o= f discourse, and "poi broda" is a restriction to just those thing= s that satisfy "broda". Yes, that would work too. At the cost of = introducing a new KOhA that refers to everything in the universe of discour= se, of course.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
<= div>
<= div>This also has the advantage of getting away from making descripti= ons assertive, as {noi} seems to do.=C2=A0 Of course, it leaves the questio= n of why this equation is of interest. =C2=A0

The original reason for coming up with a paraph= rase was probably something like this: "lo" logically needs as an= argument a proposition with (at least one) free variable, which is bound b= y "lo". But syntactically "lo" only has a sumti-tail as= its dependent. and a sumti-tail is not flexible enough for many purposes. = For example, to show the underlying logical structure of "lo mamta be = re da" it is useful to be able to export the quantifier to a prenex, w= hich a sumti-tail does not provide. There are different workarounds to this= limitation. One is to introduce the new cmavo "poi'i", which= converts a bridi, with a marked free variable, into a selbri which is just= what we need for a sumti-tail, now we can rewrite "lo mamta be re da&= quot; as "lo poi'i re da zo'u ke'a mamta da". "x= xx poi" would also serve: "xxx poi re da zo'u ke'a mamta = da", and "zo'e noi" also serves the same purpose. The ma= in and probably only advantage of "zo'e noi" over the other t= wo is that it doesn't use any unofficial cmavo.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c25944cb08450505184d2e--