Received: from mail-yk0-f188.google.com ([209.85.160.188]:60392) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XcyGh-0002wP-0h for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:42 -0700 Received: by mail-yk0-f188.google.com with SMTP id 19sf1028479ykq.25 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=subject:references:from:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ronydAViruZkY4f7ROGpfuZ4CVxS676dqAs/dfPdgOI=; b=fdOgcUEKEbk+VLu12WisNtgU3+Na28KabL8VyNCv9rXX0ppWBN/Z7xhUfYbT9YJL+L rhFAkpdRqWoM9VjZuVYE+qbskxU55D5PpHOpdjJn2ODcR4oXS6Gpc9P0D9nABiedePlx gJfy8ShWV5OCJhFWfPZzK0fv0w3/wt/2S215lUOtkqqXkXXh0Iadk6NK4MI+MRvRnWIK 2m/GycmXH2hf6KU15h8PQBsatRG6amO9vw2lbTu7LdgDmlQu+ebmjt8BNfnUra5/3gCg 4Cg+yQARGZhE7SYaWtZeD4VOUV32btark4cGsUW/MhObvs6ABjqRP2fWc11Fn0QVQbi4 GkGw== X-Received: by 10.50.109.233 with SMTP id hv9mr157439igb.6.1413040052664; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.17.71 with SMTP id m7ls1072608igd.5.gmail; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.193.161 with SMTP id hp1mr3183367pac.40.1413040052365; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm18-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com. [98.138.91.148]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g10si454984igg.0.2014.10.11.08.07.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 08:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.148 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.138.91.148; Received: from [98.138.100.112] by nm18.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Oct 2014 15:07:31 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.131] by tm103.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Oct 2014 15:07:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp218.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Oct 2014 15:07:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 833901.15631.bm@smtp218.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Q0XH8T4VM1lyuQr_EAm4CP9OPJMdBgs9nVczntYdVQ6ojzd k0HWRkuGndue0_tpwx9dReJNpiHh8r7.ayDOa7oc6.ouNoSmB_LX5wE56iYa POlFYUDwW7vGLwjebTPozU9UaEIFseU6NjsnaY5noN8F9FLFetz90wDoriiv d2uucNEoU9pF1hiyw0L28INk25zidSzZ16YHpA.wG1u3zPMFJ4fZ4ZxAiowx 552St.aioCmie_bthvpfCuRXSypMX111vI7Em6Q2rwUahdh8BqpMJMY4KIv8 7Gjx2D.UY0rBfz0VOhpg0Y24kd6XRZ5XQDwjruatSRRltfff3yohQCag5om3 v_sIEg2oBgdgldS0hdMK5zRuqDpBPvBTMyh3vXLNo.hj3jYC1G9MtjCEItxq p5Kr2mB8pD7EEOXZIOoTpS8L3y_EiX.t0y6GIg3aa32c6NZz5_LJCwrifdz2 J7vZjOLBOHhQsOB_i0u5S4xsVJINLgZYcT26U2l9Bj68kHS0Bd.dErcl_uQ4 S6Jcbo5d8Ebm7p0ozF4IiO8O2M9eTXg6OmIN_lAu5gHcjgMf4aSdk8eLTZKK iIOk3q0yWgjMKXxR6wkYC8WWC0g68p9O8X7rihPdy4GRl4F.cZ8d8G4segGj 2yU8BEzx7iFxd.ON.BSG8v6ZXpueoOquXesfPhfBQXAKd3jvGKI62voYg8cg EXRqusn9an2xEln.iB2Vw X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 References: <5349359c-f884-4976-a3e1-b0610eabeff6@googlegroups.com> <20140928013358.GB28734@gonzales> <20140928152915.GB7320@gonzales> <20141004141407.GG32481@gonzales> <20141005153531.GA1974@gonzales> <20141005214350.GC1974@gonzales> <5433F201.2020902@gmail.com> <5434EA6C.9090507@gmail.com> <1412802488.55250.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412861205.15295.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412871334.88429.YahooMailNeo@web181106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412904403.17231.YahooMailNeo@web181104.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412944837.7070.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1412988188.73626.YahooMailNeo@web181105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: "'John E. Clifford' via lojban" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:07:35 -0500 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Original-From: "John E. Clifford" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-C54BD646-4F16-4B3F-9909-796A5F1DE8B0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_bar: / --Apple-Mail-C54BD646-4F16-4B3F-9909-796A5F1DE8B0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sorry I got the wrong reading. I have to take your word that the "Lojban" = says something else, since it is quite unintelligible. Sent from my iPad On Oct 11, 2014, at 9:20, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:39 AM, 'John E. Clifford' via lojban wrote: >=20 > I got to wondering about "What I think John knows is possible", ignoring = the extra problems of cognitive predicates and using / for the descriptor, = since typefaces keep confusing LC ell with one and uc i. P /x(Bi/y(^Kjx^y))= , which Is not going to convert easily, as you say. >=20 > Actually, the English is ambiguous, but my example was just a referring t= erm, not a complete formula: /x(Bi/y(^Kj/z(^Px^z)^y) if I understand the = notation correctly. I suppose you just read the English and not the Lojban = forms, which didn't share that ambiguity: >=20 > lo poi'i mi jinvi lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumki > xxx poi mi jinvi lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumki > zo'e noi mi jinvi lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumki >=20 > =20 > But that is no reason to disparage cases that do convert easily. =20 >=20 > We're not disparaging the more ergonomic forms, they are used all the ti= me.=20 >=20 > Indeed, it makes me inclined to doubt the legitimacy of the form itself (= quantifying in and all that). >=20 > What would it mean that it was illegitimate? It wouldn't mean anything, o= r it would mean something else? >=20 > mu'o mi'e xorxes >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --Apple-Mail-C54BD646-4F16-4B3F-9909-796A5F1DE8B0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Sorry I got the wrong rea= ding.  I have to take your word that the "Lojban" says something else,= since it is quite unintelligible.

Sent from my iPad

O= n Oct 11, 2014, at 9:20, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">


On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:39 AM, 'John E.= Clifford' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:=

I g= ot to wondering about "What I think John knows is possible", ignoring the e= xtra problems of cognitive predicates and using / for the descriptor, since= typefaces keep confusing LC ell with one and uc i. P /x(Bi/y(^Kjx^y)), whi= ch Is not going to convert easily, as you say.

Actually, the English is ambiguous, but my example = was just a referring term, not a complete formula:  /x(Bi/y(^Kj/z(^Px^= z)^y)  if I understand the notation correctly. I suppose you just read= the English and not the Lojban forms, which didn't share that ambiguity:

  lo poi'i mi jinvi lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumk= i
  xx= x poi mi jinvi lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumki
  zo'e noi mi jinv= i lo du'u la djan cu djuno lo du'u ke'a cumki

 
 Bu= t that is no reason to disparage cases that do convert easily.  

 We're not disparaging t= he more ergonomic forms, they are used all the time. 

Indeed, it makes m= e inclined to doubt the legitimacy of the form itself (quantifying in and a= ll that).

What would it = mean that it was illegitimate? It wouldn't mean anything, or it would mean = something else?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--Apple-Mail-C54BD646-4F16-4B3F-9909-796A5F1DE8B0--