Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C37A0704-29FA-4C0B-8F13-47ED7EA9F2A3@yahoo.com>
References: <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2fokLXQ3queR+jP88xaoxMPQBQUojsAOZrF49hKTY=-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141009010533.GF18854@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2erLDXJy5jOAx7--+vamH9brWJNSH2K82ACJgKbDVvD8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141009233031.GC1592@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2cpdLRm8AOtHjADMKMP10uFu_N4mfddsP0-q07YnFzSLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141010234033.GG22868@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2dXyFzuCiv3g18B2poF3YZwE4RQFTTvdfXGVXuycWmLyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141011021201.GH22868@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2c_S3hC5K3eqSkmFjzZT4F5BRFLJ_+X44N212sygj_VGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141011143749.GD23876@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2dEB=OsT6hkw1SRzPMRV6qOm7LpNXapdwKAb8s9y889oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+hp0WVAjiV6RnUVyRnAoY6a9g4q262DtUjW-Dx8C22dVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2eNDBoZMb0cfPSL=WD93HYCuYMtjdcj_APOMhX0pzD-TQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2ezx1s9UJxiqBeeM6jHOH=OCzo=oRZhyjFMxk2AqaB5-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<930D4F65-7C22-48E1-9B55-4B9A3C81CF37@yahoo.com>
	<CAO7tK2fVFDvq_t6oojQcnuu1zApfVx=J2yQS9DCtrwf2CD1D8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<C37A0704-29FA-4C0B-8F13-47ED7EA9F2A3@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:04:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2eewFpXOQrh2fz_dGbcg3+Ygd_T-efeSmb95VWfZ=T=Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c31ae3255605052b2c31
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--089e0158c31ae3255605052b2c31
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:46 PM, 'John E. Clifford' via lojban <
lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Does p have to be the same for each value of x?  Or does it just have to
> be the same up to x?  That is, can this be "I want three men to run for
> governor" in the sense of, say, needing to fill out a ballot.  They have to
> be this worldly, but my wishes don't involve their identities. ?
>

p is the proposition that satisfies "ci da zo'u ke'a du'u da co'e", so yes
with singular "ci" it has to be the same proposition for each of three
values of x, which doesn't make much sense.

Now with plural "ci" it would make sense again, since now it is, for some
three men, the proposition that they run.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--089e0158c31ae3255605052b2c31
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:46 PM, &#39;John E. Clifford&#39; via lojban =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com" target=3D"=
_blank">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex"><div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>Does p have to be the same for =
each value of x?=C2=A0 Or does it just have to be the same up to x?=C2=A0 T=
hat is, can this be &quot;I want three men to run for governor&quot; in the=
 sense of, say, needing to fill out a ballot.=C2=A0 They have to be this wo=
rldly, but my wishes don&#39;t involve their identities. ?</div></div></blo=
ckquote><div><br></div><div>p is the proposition that satisfies &quot;ci da=
 zo&#39;u ke&#39;a du&#39;u da co&#39;e&quot;, so yes with singular &quot;c=
i&quot; it has to be the same proposition for each of three values of x, wh=
ich doesn&#39;t make much sense.</div><div><br></div><div>Now with plural &=
quot;ci&quot; it would make sense again, since now it is, for some three me=
n, the proposition that they run.</div><div><br></div><div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;=
e xorxes</div><div>=C2=A0=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--089e0158c31ae3255605052b2c31--