Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.20;
Message-ID: <543C1D68.2000805@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:43:52 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
References: <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales>	<CAO7tK2fokLXQ3queR+jP88xaoxMPQBQUojsAOZrF49hKTY=-LQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20141009010533.GF18854@gonzales>	<CAO7tK2erLDXJy5jOAx7--+vamH9brWJNSH2K82ACJgKbDVvD8g@mail.gmail.com>	<20141009233031.GC1592@gonzales>	<CAO7tK2cpdLRm8AOtHjADMKMP10uFu_N4mfddsP0-q07YnFzSLA@mail.gmail.com>	<20141010234033.GG22868@gonzales>	<CAO7tK2dXyFzuCiv3g18B2poF3YZwE4RQFTTvdfXGVXuycWmLyw@mail.gmail.com>	<20141011021201.GH22868@gonzales>	<543917AA.30802@gmail.com>	<20141011141805.GC23876@gonzales>	<543BB275.8050204@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2fd=Y8_+kcfbTZrRPVvE4K4qPCwQ2g-MoJ8oDypUQvOWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2fd=Y8_+kcfbTZrRPVvE4K4qPCwQ2g-MoJ8oDypUQvOWg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e
> In the particular case of "tu'a" in
> LAhE, for example, we can just create two subselmaho LAhE1 and LAhE2
> which share the same morphophonological combinatorics but differ
> (slightly) in the logical form behind them.

I actually think {tu'a} deserves its own selma'o. Not only is it 
different from the other LAhE, there is also a proposal to allow {tu'a} 
to work on tag-terms:

tu'a bai ko'a -> lo su'u bai ko'a zo'u co'e

There are no obviously useful corresponding forms for the other LAhE, so 
I would personally be tempted to move {tu'a} to TUhA rather than 
creating a bunch of meaningless but "grammatical" forms for non-{tu'a} LAhE.

In a similar vein, I am for splitting up the PA selma'o in order to 
outlaw the many nonsensical grammatical PA-strings and to give the 
meaningful PA-strings a proper parse tree (which they currently do not 
have. The meaning of complex quantifiers corresponds only rarely to the 
structure the parser suggests).

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.