Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <543C1D68.2000805@gmx.de>
References: <20141008015245.GB17866@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2fokLXQ3queR+jP88xaoxMPQBQUojsAOZrF49hKTY=-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141009010533.GF18854@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2erLDXJy5jOAx7--+vamH9brWJNSH2K82ACJgKbDVvD8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141009233031.GC1592@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2cpdLRm8AOtHjADMKMP10uFu_N4mfddsP0-q07YnFzSLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141010234033.GG22868@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2dXyFzuCiv3g18B2poF3YZwE4RQFTTvdfXGVXuycWmLyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141011021201.GH22868@gonzales>
	<543917AA.30802@gmail.com>
	<20141011141805.GC23876@gonzales>
	<543BB275.8050204@gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2fd=Y8_+kcfbTZrRPVvE4K4qPCwQ2g-MoJ8oDypUQvOWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<543C1D68.2000805@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:14:23 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2fN7vyLp0KO8X1SFHsZti7pvkM_r0Uo1B8kDSx8dYO-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a89a46e01000505538b5f
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--047d7b3a89a46e01000505538b5f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:43 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

>
> I actually think {tu'a} deserves its own selma'o. Not only is it different
> from the other LAhE, there is also a proposal to allow {tu'a} to work on
> tag-terms:
>
> tu'a bai ko'a -> lo su'u bai ko'a zo'u co'e
>

Makes sense. So we can say for example:

  mi zmanei tu'a se pi'o lo forca
  "I prefer with a fork."

There are no obviously useful corresponding forms for the other LAhE, so I
> would personally be tempted to move {tu'a} to TUhA rather than creating a
> bunch of meaningless but "grammatical" forms for non-{tu'a} LAhE.
>

Right.

In a similar vein, I am for splitting up the PA selma'o in order to outlaw
> the many nonsensical grammatical PA-strings and to give the meaningful
> PA-strings a proper parse tree (which they currently do not have. The
> meaning of complex quantifiers corresponds only rarely to the structure the
> parser suggests).


I agree.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7b3a89a46e01000505538b5f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:43 PM, selpa&#39;i <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:seladwa@gmx.de" target=3D"_blank">seladwa@gmx.de</a>&gt;</span> =
wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bord=
er-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br></span>
I actually think {tu&#39;a} deserves its own selma&#39;o. Not only is it di=
fferent from the other LAhE, there is also a proposal to allow {tu&#39;a} t=
o work on tag-terms:<br>
<br>
tu&#39;a bai ko&#39;a -&gt; lo su&#39;u bai ko&#39;a zo&#39;u co&#39;e<br><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>Makes sense. So we can say for example:</di=
v><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 mi zmanei tu&#39;a se pi&#39;o lo forca</div><=
div>=C2=A0 &quot;I prefer with a fork.&quot; =C2=A0</div><div><br></div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
There are no obviously useful corresponding forms for the other LAhE, so I =
would personally be tempted to move {tu&#39;a} to TUhA rather than creating=
 a bunch of meaningless but &quot;grammatical&quot; forms for non-{tu&#39;a=
} LAhE.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Right.=C2=A0</div><div><br></di=
v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
In a similar vein, I am for splitting up the PA selma&#39;o in order to out=
law the many nonsensical grammatical PA-strings and to give the meaningful =
PA-strings a proper parse tree (which they currently do not have. The meani=
ng of complex quantifiers corresponds only rarely to the structure the pars=
er suggests).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree.</div><div><br></div>=
<div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7b3a89a46e01000505538b5f--