Received: from mail-ig0-f186.google.com ([209.85.213.186]:39772) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XeUhn-0002y4-Qh for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:58:01 -0700 Received: by mail-ig0-f186.google.com with SMTP id uq10sf271469igb.23 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qdofMPxzNReWgXWnWn6QJRXGgylgYZjX34hYV2/ESoc=; b=TG8UeEHy90esm9n2H+Myd3XOy7aW4aIhTR+flTYDrBKWjgci5qwkvY/LBAvz6UJ3y/ QcFTFVi/88h5KTDG8LviiZnhkgNYMUw7AR8uFfnz+7Cbndsc6XwpQI/dFv09sy1/r2gH 3/qYfbil6Ao/wBRlDHlfdXLvBkiae5Yq4c5JJTQJHMqCMP/pqtdqywbXAUv8/kryWTkM zWYlpNTYIqgOuccrw6fJrkCdgjymfL+x9DHIoUs0acjA4OhFWggJJDA555VH7Z7BDhPe DOScRHD5axnElevOG4fBHfZ9lk7OL8QAwTIWYBLdsShbXdyJie0cMxLN1ZuXLjq15ZQF fAnA== X-Received: by 10.51.16.65 with SMTP id fu1mr912igd.10.1413403069543; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.51.16.66 with SMTP id fu2ls2931957igd.0.canary; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.157.166 with SMTP id wn6mr9686665pab.17.1413403069235; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.15.226 with SMTP id a2msigd; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.47.51 with SMTP id a19mr9464704ign.7.1413391008098; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from icebubble.org (smtp.icebubble.org. [174.136.103.210]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl6si3223968qcb.0.2014.10.15.09.36.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.136.103.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sunrise2000@comcast.net) client-ip=174.136.103.210; Received: from petunia by icebubble.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XeRZ4-0000qo-H1 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:36:42 +0000 Received: from rusat by cmarib.ramside with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XeQbs-0006N0-6z for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:35:32 +0000 From: sunrise2000@comcast.net To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: [lojban] tosmabru test: intelligible explanation sought Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:35:32 +0000 Message-ID: <86ppdtmjln.fsf@cmarib.ramside> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: sunrise2000@comcast.net X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 174.136.103.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sunrise2000@comcast.net) smtp.mail=sunrise2000@comcast.net; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=comcast.net Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - coi rodo I'm looking for an (intelligible) explanation of the "tosmabru test" that's part of the "lujvo-making alogrithm" in section 11 of chapter 4 of the CLL (the chapter on morphology). The problem I'm having is that the explanation of the tosmabru test on p. 71 can only be understood by someone who already understands the test. (...which kind of defeats the point of reading and writing about it, doesn't it?) In particular: 1. In the pattern "CVC...CVC + X", is the "..." intended to represent a sequence only of CVC rafsi? 2. What does "something which has caused a 'y'-hyphen to be installed between the previous CVC and itself by one of the above rules" mean? Is that just a complicated way of saying that the final consonant of the final CVC and initial consonant of X formed an impermissible consonant pair? Does reference to "the above rules" include rule 5, the tosmabru test itself? 3. When "no further hyphens are needed", to what level of recursion does that refer? 4. When installing a y-hyphen at "the first such joint", is the first joint counted from the left, or from the right? 5. I presume, if the tosmabru test doesn't apply, that the lujvo "passes" the test (because it's the last step in the lujvo-making algorithm), but the description doesn't explicitly state this. Basically, the description in the CLL can only be understood if you already understand the test, or can re-invent it yourself. Could somebody please point me to a clear explanation of this "tosmabru test"? ki'e sai -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.