Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::232;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20141022230855.GG2128@gonzales>
References: <20141018004531.GE20049@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2c8JQsr+7zbrdos-9Wm1t8w+sH1SANSO6e_MGV4ZDjcow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141018180946.GF20049@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2dUSzYCWm+CNeNugkeU=aO6mWXSY3gn5dc+8XNU3GpasQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141018233648.GA29040@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2eUqpe3AwAY-DxmONhxM3Pj5kyhTm605bAnD3iJEHVgug@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141021010639.GB11705@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2c+ObFDqF_TZTQMjGJRZfZxpoY-pFB4_canWM3Lpdgvsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141022002214.GD25753@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2djRZbrg-9HH49qPWH=ds4Tnmj+H26o-L9cywiM3jos7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141022230855.GG2128@gonzales>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:38:12 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2eqsbpMbYu_m93pq9JEVcCvoSbhsg_hNF3v8=6KAartYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3a16ae8797a05060b70cb
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--001a11c3a16ae8797a05060b70cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

>
> ba gi broda gi zajba  ==  broda .i ba bo zajba
> bai gi broda gi zajba  ==  zajba .i bai bo broda
>
> Which reminds me - which way should
>     broda .i ba je bai bo zajba
> work, or should it be some mix? If a mix, how about with {joi}?
>

I guess it would be: "ba je se bai gi broda gi zajba" and the same for
"joi", but we should unify all tags to work the same way.


> I think it might also make sense to analyse tag-connectives as if they
> were
> > ordinary tags on the second connectand, with the first connectand acting
> as
> > their complement, so:
> >
> > broda .i [jek tag] bo brode
> > -> broda .i [jek] brode [(se} tag] lo nu broda
>
> But if broda doesn't occur, what is {lo nu broda} referring to here?
>

In that case the complement would have to be "lo nu na broda". So:

broda .i [jek tag] bo brode
-> broda .i [jek] brode [(se} tag] lo nu xu kau broda

where "lo nu xu kau broda" is whichever of "lo nu broda" and "lo nu na
broda" is true.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--001a11c3a16ae8797a05060b70cb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Martin Bays <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:mbays@sdf.org" target=3D"_blank">mbays@sdf.org</a>&gt;</span>=
 wrote:</div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rg=
b(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
ba gi broda gi zajba=C2=A0 =3D=3D=C2=A0 broda .i ba bo zajba<br>
bai gi broda gi zajba=C2=A0 =3D=3D=C2=A0 zajba .i bai bo broda<br>
<br>
Which reminds me - which way should<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 broda .i ba je bai bo zajba<br>
work, or should it be some mix? If a mix, how about with {joi}?<br></blockq=
uote><div><br></div><div>I guess it would be: &quot;ba je se bai gi broda g=
i zajba&quot; and the same for &quot;joi&quot;, but we should unify all tag=
s to work the same way.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px=
;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1e=
x"><span class=3D"">
&gt; I think it might also make sense to analyse tag-connectives as if they=
 were<br>
&gt; ordinary tags on the second connectand, with the first connectand acti=
ng as<br>
&gt; their complement, so:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; broda .i [jek tag] bo brode<br>
&gt; -&gt; broda .i [jek] brode [(se} tag] lo nu broda<br>
<br>
</span>But if broda doesn&#39;t occur, what is {lo nu broda} referring to h=
ere?<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">In that case the co=
mplement would have to be &quot;lo nu na broda&quot;. So:</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">broda .i [jek tag] bo=
 brode<br>-&gt; broda .i [jek] brode [(se} tag] lo nu xu kau broda<br></div=
><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">where &quo=
t;lo nu xu kau broda&quot; is whichever of &quot;lo nu broda&quot; and &quo=
t;lo nu na broda&quot; is true.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><=
div class=3D"gmail_extra">mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div class=3D"gmail=
_extra"><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--001a11c3a16ae8797a05060b70cb--