Received: from mail-lb0-f188.google.com ([209.85.217.188]:42047) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XiLJn-0007Qo-Hy for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:45:13 -0700 Received: by mail-lb0-f188.google.com with SMTP id 10sf418636lbg.5 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mZu1VgXJN7dFegii/Z+jaOpnZ9zXk+r8NHntZKOi70E=; b=B0IaDD71UKHuE0bt3pgUHgM1IYZqUy0sm7/Q9JHaI0scXVrVRoqlIHHr1M75aCC8EW VSTR8Rm+KGomz7tlxvnd5+qyDUFHVCnPXYU4YTKI/+11Taad8yWQCPq0rEMU0jS1TCen UzaZQ38cjRaq/527U/YX2s5+J9eiZ//Cj6dz4rgnokavni/99QdIwdmBTHMESr0TSzgh MYz/iGMrcjRU+JDQnJqVqhyTL3dly2xkHD1126sK85tYXJMr5TpvVQ/w8pUAmkQN8Ora wa7PdhitvQGPzP3plimzaTOC0kspPvt8yjf+BMExYi4sZ8Zq7FuFBbBUn68gMrYL3AVd 2LzA== X-Received: by 10.152.21.39 with SMTP id s7mr237811lae.4.1414320296079; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.207.67 with SMTP id lu3ls236541lac.50.gmail; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.6.4 with SMTP id w4mr207655law.7.1414320294904; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej8si336615wib.3.2014.10.26.03.44.54 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::233; Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b13so3775319wgh.10 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.102.135 with SMTP id fo7mr15000285wib.79.1414320294782; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.103.65 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11515679.0XVSvhUjgQ@caracal> References: <5bf2774f-1cad-4603-8fa5-d4d96f3f3fed@googlegroups.com> <11515679.0XVSvhUjgQ@caracal> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:44:54 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtsb2piYW5dIERvZXMgTG9qYmFuIGhhdmUgYW4gZXF1aXZhbGVudCBvZiDokKwv?= =?UTF-8?B?66eML+S4hyAoMTAgdGhvdXNhbmQpPw==?= From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444728fc4ee090506511ae6 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d0444728fc4ee090506511ae6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-10-26 2:05 GMT+03:00 Pierre Abbat : > On Friday, October 24, 2014 23:36:18 Zilong Lee wrote: > > I'm a native Mandarin speaker. In East Asia, we have different number > > scales than the West, especially when the number gets bigger than 10 > > thousand, we use another word, namely '=E8=90=AC/=E4=B8=87(wan4)' in Ch= inese, '=EB=A7=8C/=E8=90=AC(man)' > in > > Korean and '=E4=B8=87'(man) in Japanese(I'm not sure whether it exists = in other > > East Asian languages like Vietnamese and Mongolian, etc.), instead of > > keeping using thousand. So to a Chinese/Korean/Japanese ear, '17 > thousand' > > sounds very confusing. > > > > If Lojban is truly culturally neutral, I think we should have an > equivalent > > word of 10-thousand. Is it already there? or that it has never been > thought > > about? > > I don't know if any Lojbanist has thought about it, but East Asia is not > the > only place where this system has been used. Ancient Greek used the myriad= ic > system. Aramaic (and probably also Hebrew, the words are cognate) also us= ed > the myriadic system; the number in Revelation 9:16 is =CE=B4=CF=85=CE=BF = =CE=BC=CF=85=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=B1=CE=B4=CE=B5=CF=82 =CE=BC=CF=85=CF=81=CE=B9= =CE=B1=CE=B4=CF=89=CE=BD > (with lots of variations, some dropping "two") in Greek and =D7=AA=D7=A8= =D7=AA=D7=99=D7=9F =D7=A8=D7=91=D7=95 =D7=A8=D7=91=D7=95=D7=9F > (tarteyn rebu rebwan) in Aramaic, both meaning "two myriad myriads". Mode= rn > Greek, though, uses =CE=B5=CE=BA=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=BC=CF=85=CF= =81=CE=B9=CE=BF (hundred myriad) for million and bases the > words for bigger numbers on that. > > Among the six source languages, there's another that uses a different > system. > Hindi and other Indic languages have words for ten times the powers of a > hundred: hazar, lakh, crore, abaj, sankh. A big number is written as > 4,29,49,67,296. > So what roots do we have? 10^2: Hindi hazar 10^4: man/van/wan for East Asia, r?b for Aramaic miriad for Ancient Greek Hindi lax 10^6: Hindi tcrore 10^8: Hindi abadj 10^10: Hindi sanx ? ju'o i determined hindi numbers incorrectly. > Pierre > -- > La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre. > Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d0444728fc4ee090506511ae6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-10-26 2:05 GMT+03:00 Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>:
On Friday, October 2= 4, 2014 23:36:18 Zilong Lee wrote:
> I'm a native Mandarin speaker. In East Asia, we have different num= ber
> scales than the West, especially when the number gets bigger than 10 > thousand, we use another word, namely '=E8=90=AC/=E4=B8=87(wan4)&#= 39; in Chinese, '=EB=A7=8C/=E8=90=AC(man)' in
> Korean and '=E4=B8=87'(man) in Japanese(I'm not sure wheth= er it exists in other
> East Asian languages like Vietnamese and Mongolian, etc.), instead of<= br> > keeping using thousand. So to a Chinese/Korean/Japanese ear, '17 t= housand'
> sounds very confusing.
>
> If Lojban is truly culturally neutral, I think we should have an equiv= alent
> word of 10-thousand. Is it already there? or that it has never been th= ought
> about?

I don't know if any Lojbanist has thought about it, but East Asi= a is not the
only place where this system has been used. Ancient Greek used the myriadic=
system. Aramaic (and probably also Hebrew, the words are cognate) also used=
the myriadic system; the number in Revelation 9:16 is =CE=B4=CF=85=CE=BF = =CE=BC=CF=85=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=B1=CE=B4=CE=B5=CF=82 =CE=BC=CF=85=CF=81=CE=B9= =CE=B1=CE=B4=CF=89=CE=BD
(with lots of variations, some dropping "two") in Greek and =D7= =AA=D7=A8=D7=AA=D7=99=D7=9F =D7=A8=D7=91=D7=95 =D7=A8=D7=91=D7=95=D7=9F
(tarteyn rebu rebwan) in Aramaic, both meaning "two myriad myriads&quo= t;. Modern
Greek, though, uses =CE=B5=CE=BA=CE=B1=CF=84=CE=BF=CE=BC=CE=BC=CF=85=CF=81= =CE=B9=CE=BF (hundred myriad) for million and bases the
words for bigger numbers on that.

Among the six source languages, there's another that uses a different s= ystem.
Hindi and other Indic languages have words for ten times the powers of a hundred: hazar, lakh, crore, abaj, sankh. A big number is written as
4,29,49,67,296.

So what roots do we hav= e?
10^2:
Hindi hazar
10^4:
man/van/= wan for East Asia,
r?b for Aramaic
miriad for Ancient G= reek
Hindi lax
10^6:
Hindi tcrore
1= 0^8:
Hindi abadj
10^10:
Hindi sanx
=
?
ju'o i determined hindi numbers incorrectly.=


Pierre
--
La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d0444728fc4ee090506511ae6--