Received: from mail-ee0-f63.google.com ([74.125.83.63]:38598) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XisFO-0000fh-6v for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:47 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f63.google.com with SMTP id d49sf156679eek.18 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=lEwkSUUQpMc6oOSzDJhe1gaFfOUN0z+TBF7qWwOhtfk=; b=R6VUB9tn6Lv3V5WlXWTAi4ELYcabdkYZhOu+C8xs8kmVbNylLsPrrklMgvUKwbeMOi CNdhHsmjZD0G+9pcJpMAtuBZ3v5WBErcPcnvAaFjSFyyRSFm/iMNBOqNOscyLUvXB6zg CEQAZuOhlWS7AoQVOEuzrtq456mwuXPVmyNdQuEs10Kjmby7WKn/1u7DawSIv4I2jcgD TciPE9nxRhXT4r532W575lLoMjvUh34DdwtlBr0k8umSNhr+fBgJFXe0aVBZjjTP4sDF ITAo/XDc7UdJTXGgc4Sjfoli6xowBh1LYJOq/JVHGEaJgm4M+Kz3uRYF+wpx/Fi6+MjN HmDg== X-Received: by 10.180.89.244 with SMTP id br20mr705wib.13.1414446875111; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.99.105 with SMTP id ep9ls424465wib.48.gmail; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.182.164 with SMTP id ef4mr19458wic.0.1414446874771; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ca20si548098wib.3.2014.10.27.14.54.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::233; Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l18so20065wgh.34 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.84.194 with SMTP id b2mr24027494wiz.57.1414446874673; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:54:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86oasytm4y.fsf@cmarib.ramside> References: <86ppdtmjln.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <86oasytm4y.fsf@cmarib.ramside> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 18:54:34 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tosmabru test: intelligible explanation sought From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426b9884e22c05066e93d6 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d04426b9884e22c05066e93d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:02 PM, wrote: > > > All three of these "lujvo" pass the tosmabru test as laid out on p. 71. > {cc} is not a valid initial consonant pair, so the test passes and > doesn't demand a tosmabru y-hyphen. You're quite right, this is a known erratum in the printed version: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL,+aka+Reference+Grammar,+Errata You can find the correct version of rule 5a) in http://lojban.github.io/cll/4/11/ At this point, I'm so confused I'm not even sure what the proper form > for a lujvo is. Does anyone have a formal description (i.e., grammar > rules) for what constitutes a valid lujvo? The PEG morphology gives formal grammar rules for all word forms: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+PEG+Morphology+Algorithm mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d04426b9884e22c05066e93d6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:02 PM, <sunrise2000@comcast.net&g= t; wrote:

All three of these "lujvo" pass the tosmabru test as laid out on = p. 71.
{cc} is not a valid initial consonant pair, so the test passes and
doesn't demand a tosmabru y-hyphen.=C2=A0

You're quite right, this is a known erratum in the printed version: = h= ttp://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL,+aka+Reference+Grammar,+Errata
=
You can find the correct version of rule 5a) in http://lojban.github.io/cll/4/11/

At this point, I'm so confused I'= m not even sure what the proper form
for a lujvo is.=C2=A0 Does anyone have a formal description (i.e., grammar<= br> rules) for what constitutes a valid lujvo?

= The PEG morphology gives formal grammar rules for all word forms:=C2=A0


mu'o mi'e xo= rxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d04426b9884e22c05066e93d6--