Received: from mail-la0-f62.google.com ([209.85.215.62]:34278) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xj8ky-00011Z-0v for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:29 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f62.google.com with SMTP id pn19sf81561lab.27 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GzDBR3Vbt4HFYpNJUeb7pWqz/JTS1wVnoomMiHqwnCc=; b=Zg9qInEyrjq5z36zOa8rwTVOlw7hxd8TsbuLA11LUuJBgFohymFWV8/c6wg/R/gFGr UBgEGF5wkIGBBpkotJTRKV7CajRpEuag8jDYCXblobmY9G2ekenujO4T7/fHtcpdgWr4 YXPFDo5xjJvhe/cTCtMOBM2FtFNMaJFj0pFKlMZXg/k6Ynjp5fTWK4zpZIi+QM2ncluJ wFYMOk0wEXFXsYtsNjQPM9+2A+zBbIjV+Gg4OalCTeveTth/Xb7kZGiWPDlbVDGNHmGF C/B9FjD5ihUbHirQKa5F9nADa/6gr/cVhZor6Bof2rG2WpUv8bq74jLqGN/vj3Lujep5 AUXw== X-Received: by 10.152.29.39 with SMTP id g7mr13461lah.16.1414510335828; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.20.42 with SMTP id k10ls71478lae.66.gmail; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.247.74 with SMTP id yc10mr683963lbc.8.1414510334827; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej8si129364wib.3.2014.10.28.08.32.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236; Received: by mail-wi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d1so1970731wiv.9 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.175.67 with SMTP id by3mr5252616wjc.32.1414510334734; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (37-1-168-17.ip.skylogicnet.com. [37.1.168.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ha2sm2571261wib.19.2014.10.28.08.32.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <544FB6F3.5010301@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:32:03 +0100 From: Ilmen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 References: <20141018004531.GE20049@gonzales> <20141018180946.GF20049@gonzales> <20141018233648.GA29040@gonzales> <20141021010639.GB11705@gonzales> <20141022002214.GD25753@gonzales> <544D68A0.8000402@gmail.com> <20141028024248.GB6097@gonzales> In-Reply-To: <20141028024248.GB6097@gonzales> X-Original-Sender: ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070600030406000901000608" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070600030406000901000608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/10/2014 03:42, Martin Bays wrote: >> {fi'o broda xy} has a rather vague semantic, it's not clear >> how the bridi is related to the fact/event of "xy broda". >> >> However I think {fi'o xo'i TAG} =3D {TAG}, by definition. > I guess that can't be literally true, since the former is vague as you > say while the latter isn't. > Maybe should I have said =C2=AB I think that {fi'o xo'i fi'o broda} =3D {fi= 'o=20 broda} =C2=BB. >> {xo'i}'s purpose is to allow using directly the predicates that are >> underlying sumtcita whose associated predicate hasn't any Lojban >> predicate word (e.g. {pu'i}, {nu'o}, {za'o} and the like). >> However I'm not fond of {xo'i}, I'd rather prefer the missing sumtcita >> predicates to be given a real predicate word and be done with it. :) > It's useful for the kind of formal conversions this thread is mostly > about, though. I don't know how to handle {pe [tag]} without using > {xo'i} (and without having a lookup table to find an appropriate > selbri). I think ultimately using a lookup table would be the best option, so=20 that we definitively get rid of sumtcita in the logical form. Moreover I don't think we can handle all the sumtcita the same way. If=20 {broda ba xy} implies {lo nu broda cu balvi xy}, can we infer that=20 {broda seka'a mi} implies {lo nu broda cu klama mi}? I don't think so. A sumtcita =E2=86=94 bridi relative clause conversion table could look like= the=20 below: SE ba X =3D xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau se pi'o X =3D xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau SE ka'a X =3D xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau fau X =3D xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau (Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.) Furthermore, {ba} and {pu} are irregular sumtcita, in that their=20 underlying predicate is inversed when they're used with {bo}: =E2=80=A2 { brode .ije *ba bo* brodo } =3D { brode .ije *ba* lo nu go'i cu = brodo=20 } (irregular ba/pu sumtcita) =E2=80=A2 { brode .ije *ki'u bo* brodo } =3D { brode .ije *se ki'u* lo nu g= o'i cu=20 brodo } (regular sumtcita) > By the way: if we take {broda} to be equivalent to {da fasnu gi'e nu > broda}, is {broda xoi brodu} equivalent to {da fasnu gi'e nu broda kei > gi'e brodu}? > > Martin I think that's correct. mu'o mi'e la .ilmen. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --------------070600030406000901000608 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28/10/2014 03:42, Martin Bays wrote:<= br>
{fi'o broda xy} has a rather vague semantic, it's no=
t clear=20
how the bridi is related to the fact/event of "xy broda".

However I think {fi'o xo'i TAG} =3D {TAG}, by definition.
I guess that can't be literally true, since the former is vague as you
say while the latter isn't.

Maybe should I have said =C2=AB I think that {fi'o xo'i fi'o broda} =3D {fi'o broda} =C2=BB.

{xo'i}'s purpose is to allow using directly the pred=
icates that are
underlying sumtcita whose associated predicate hasn't any Lojban
predicate word (e.g. {pu'i}, {nu'o}, {za'o} and the like).
However I'm not fond of {xo'i}, I'd rather prefer the missing sumtcita=20
predicates to be given a real predicate word and be done with it. :)
It's useful for the kind of formal conversions this thread is mostly
about, though. I don't know how to handle {pe [tag]} without using
{xo'i} (and without having a lookup table to find an appropriate
selbri).
I think ultimately using a lookup table would be the best option, so that we definitively get rid of sumtcita in the logical form.

Moreover I don't think we can handle all the sumtcita the same way. If {broda ba xy} implies {lo nu broda cu balvi xy}, can we infer that {broda seka'a mi} implies {lo nu broda cu klama mi}? I don't think so.

A sumtcita =E2=86=94 bridi relative clause conversion table could look = like the below:

SE ba X=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau
se pi'o X=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau
SE ka'a X=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau fau X=C2=A0 =3D=C2=A0 xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau
(Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.)

Furthermore, {ba} and {pu} are irregular sumtcita, in that their underlying predicate is inversed when they're used with {bo}:
=E2=80=A2 { brode .ije ba bo brodo } =3D { brode .ije ba = lo nu go'i cu brodo }=C2=A0 (irregular ba/pu sumtcita)
=E2=80=A2 { brode .ije ki'u bo brodo } =3D { brode .ije se ki= 'u lo nu go'i cu brodo }=C2=A0 (regular sumtcita)

By the way: if we take {broda} to be equivalent to {da=
 fasnu gi'e nu
broda}, is {broda xoi brodu} equivalent to {da fasnu gi'e nu broda kei
gi'e brodu}?

Martin
I think that's correct.

mu'o mi'e la .ilmen.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--------------070600030406000901000608--