Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24;
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:14:30 -0500
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
Message-ID: <20141104011430.GB27496@gonzales>
References: <20141018233648.GA29040@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2eUqpe3AwAY-DxmONhxM3Pj5kyhTm605bAnD3iJEHVgug@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141021010639.GB11705@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2c+ObFDqF_TZTQMjGJRZfZxpoY-pFB4_canWM3Lpdgvsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141022002214.GD25753@gonzales>
 <544D68A0.8000402@gmail.com>
 <20141028024248.GB6097@gonzales>
 <544FB6F3.5010301@gmail.com>
 <20141030014348.GP4023@gonzales>
 <54523459.3080700@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54523459.3080700@gmail.com>
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: taske
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Thursday, 2014-10-30 at 13:51 +0100 - Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:

> On 30/10/2014 02:43, Martin Bays wrote:
> >> SE ba X  =3D  xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau
> >> se pi'o X  =3D  xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau
> >> SE ka'a X  =3D  xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau
> >> fau X  =3D  xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau
> >> (Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.)
> > I don't think it's clear that every tag permits such a definition.
> > e.g. I don't think {no roi} does.
> What's wrong with {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} =E2=86=92 {lo nu broda cu =
rapli=20
> li no}?

If {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} is taken to mean {da fasnu gi'e nu broda
kei gi'e rapli li no}, then we have something of a contradiction
- surely no da ge rapli li no gi fasnu?

--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlRYKHYACgkQULC7OLX7LNbwsACeKdwe9zV9iowZotq1BEJho+l9
8wwAoL1eXuzurbeIhaaY9g52h/nHRQ9p
=nfxZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD--