Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::235;
Message-ID: <54592B81.2050908@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:39:45 +0100
From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
References: <20141018233648.GA29040@gonzales> <CAO7tK2eUqpe3AwAY-DxmONhxM3Pj5kyhTm605bAnD3iJEHVgug@mail.gmail.com> <20141021010639.GB11705@gonzales> <CAO7tK2c+ObFDqF_TZTQMjGJRZfZxpoY-pFB4_canWM3Lpdgvsw@mail.gmail.com> <20141022002214.GD25753@gonzales> <544D68A0.8000402@gmail.com> <20141028024248.GB6097@gonzales> <544FB6F3.5010301@gmail.com> <20141030014348.GP4023@gonzales> <54523459.3080700@gmail.com> <20141104011430.GB27496@gonzales>
In-Reply-To: <20141104011430.GB27496@gonzales>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


On 04/11/2014 02:14, Martin Bays wrote:
> * Thursday, 2014-10-30 at 13:51 +0100 - Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 30/10/2014 02:43, Martin Bays wrote:
>>>> SE ba X  =3D  xoi ke'a SE balvi X vau
>>>> se pi'o X  =3D  xoi X se pilno fi ke'a vau
>>>> SE ka'a X  =3D  xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u lo nu X SE klama vau
>>>> fau X  =3D  xoi fasnu fa ke'a jo'u X vau
>>>> (Here {ke'a} stands for the outer bridi.)
>>> I don't think it's clear that every tag permits such a definition.
>>> e.g. I don't think {no roi} does.
>> What's wrong with {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} =E2=86=92 {lo nu broda cu=
 rapli
>> li no}?
> If {broda xoi ke'a rapli li no} is taken to mean {da fasnu gi'e nu broda
> kei gi'e rapli li no}, then we have something of a contradiction
> - surely no da ge rapli li no gi fasnu?
Agreed. Then, {brode xoi ke'a brodo} is probably better rendered as {da=20
fasnu gi'e nu brodo fa lo su'u brode}.
For example, {broda naku} =E2=86=92 {da fasnu gi'e nu narfau fa lo nu broda=
},=20
and not {da fasnu gi'e nu broda kei gi'e narfau}.

pei

mu'o mi'e la .ilmen.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.