Received: from mail-oi0-f64.google.com ([209.85.218.64]:64148) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XmwHr-0002D6-LA for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:02:08 -0800 Received: by mail-oi0-f64.google.com with SMTP id u20sf545528oif.29 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:01:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=mqFN4IPVMd1Ch9j7i0ibXRPReQ2lXRLa5EevDI8q2Vg=; b=x7ottFCDK2mI/L6UwXqwa076dF1JjzjaBIOXTDC2m/6mgulA9+X/hRNfZChJxEp1Zg vtZvIlRY+IFEpo8Go2LYqXnBuSeOAjlbl9l/tgBqXBOBNlYadI74wmV9Ax1OdscsEW5K f1Jti7X1UJ2kRzZwrcOlEnxHhltTv2AEevbPVg8jJvcHsNZI0kssV7Eg7eiFtkajZV5P 7UKu3sY4tZS45mZVPc439oiVljeESqMzfYhlgexTACG5+dautaIYwV9D0qPNWl3XUxuw PX+FVy/jPR+ZPsLeJGR4J7sFo5fPhDnIpZB/rFaLkr4wOMEklY1rhAsHLBezmRtsHCLQ o/Yw== X-Received: by 10.140.40.20 with SMTP id w20mr231668qgw.2.1415415717161; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:01:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.83.210 with SMTP id j76ls1035677qgd.40.gmail; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:01:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.25.72 with SMTP id y48mr11985499yhy.35.1415415716663; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.24]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nn11si1352083pdb.2.2014.11.07.19.01.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24; Received: from thegonz.net (d24-141-9-29.home.cgocable.net [24.141.9.29]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA831eMB015147 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 03:01:41 GMT Received: from martin by thegonz.net with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XmwGj-0001pH-5O for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 22:00:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:00:52 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 Message-ID: <20141108030052.GC8542@gonzales> References: <20141028022945.GA6097@gonzales> <20141030013306.GO4023@gonzales> <20141104010958.GA27496@gonzales> <20141105035457.GA7768@gonzales> <20141106232818.GB1433@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: cimni User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Friday, 2014-11-07 at 17:58 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > * Wednesday, 2014-11-05 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Martin Bays wrote: > > > > * Tuesday, 2014-11-04 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > > > > > And for non-tenses, by analogy I think it has to be > > > > > broda .i [tag] bo brode ~ broda .i broda [tag] lo nu brode > > > I was speculating on what the second proposition would be when a logi= cal > > > connective is involved. Nothing really makes much sense though. > > Is it so bad for it to be {brode}, completing the symmetry with the > > tense case? >=20 > It's unintuitive for me, it doesn't really fit the surface form. I see what you mean. But CLL is clear that brode is claimed, so I'll go with that. > > > > ca ro nu mi xagji kei mi klama lo zarci .e ba bo lo zdani > > > > -> ca ro nu mi xagji kei da poi nu mi klama lo zarci zo'u ge da > > > > fasnu gi ba da mi klama lo zdani > > > > > > ca ro nu mi xagji kei ge ko'a goi lo nu mi klama lo zarci cu fasnu g= i ba > > > ko'a mi klama lo zdani > > > > > > would work just as well, without introducing more events than were > > > there in the original. > > > > But then we have a use of {lo} which isn't constant with respect to the > > universal quantifier. I thought we didn't want to allow those? >=20 > I would say it's a constant. It's the same event that happens more than > once. Just as when I say "ca ro nu mi klama lo zarci kei mi penmi la djan" > doesn't require it to be the same time-slice of John every time. But if ko'a is a constant (kind of an) event, what does {ba ko'a mi klama lo zdani} mean? I understand the original sentence as having multiple pairs of goings, with a time relationship claimed for each pair. Martin --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlRdh2QACgkQULC7OLX7LNYa/wCg3Nc1m+2BaS/cHS7X3tgoTAtP NFIAoK0Z7WnxXawkbw3vit5cU9GDA16l =mjk5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s--