Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24;
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 12:15:32 -0500
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2
Message-ID: <20141108171532.GB10866@gonzales>
References: <20141028022945.GA6097@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2fwYkp_LEiKkHHr6qpQO=b2aT0dBkw275Z8CVaC4KzOmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141030013306.GO4023@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2ciwFP-OgBw3Z6YH9hyXPpMNR2pN7W15Ac2HsZnAkjd4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141104010958.GA27496@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2dy3oYy1F-6tQZqYbDcq30M6wAbP-mmxxMjMdCN8-0DrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141105035457.GA7768@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2dmz1QjaUQMJsfm7LFVtrjr2PT_T1eZmHEwoo1-p97WrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+iQzubnOWzH2Qt5xcV0bksKURkmD255pGSwkoSzsPWu_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7tK2fr7=EagUswoE15fzfyjRM2kYViRoZXYG7Kz6wv8WvYjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2fr7=EagUswoE15fzfyjRM2kYViRoZXYG7Kz6wv8WvYjg@mail.gmail.com>
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: latmo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Saturday, 2014-11-08 at 11:40 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.=
com>:

> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.co=
m>
> wrote:
>=20
> > In {mi nelci ko'a ne semau ko'e} isn't {ne semau} always expanded into
> > {noi ke'a no'a semau ko'e}?
>=20
> It's more like: "noi ke'a zmadu ko'e lo ka no'a xi pa".

Such rules involving {no'a} don't work for most BAI, though, so either
this is part of the definition of {mau} or (I think preferably) it's
just an obvious devaguing of {noi ke'a co'e se mau ko'e}.

--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlReT7QACgkQULC7OLX7LNZT6gCZAT+YzykuBoy9HP/bWXMK4mAl
AL8An2M2e3s7NStifNzdInxnHktg4JTz
=KIat
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip--