Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:61289) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xnulh-00062H-RB for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:37:01 -0800 Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id va2sf1209728obc.0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hxYKtYdz7ESEFAwIkcak28rSXUchFz+1F8CPILj22t0=; b=WcqyrFwZK55Au1OCaakX6Q1dIwAhyAxYpXkTvDBmEmNDs518F9T1/u++QuTAm3gOOe t8UzbSNyIOYXFdiS6q+kQKkoAQ5/VIiIgZkfNbVjgBfxoTamGKfwJqksrGMF68nDBqLp 8yyKYfuHCK2257aXs4P4ukjnyvrVyl0MEaWlsXBkPkeq1DC7exmODKsYQ2h1nMHWfjNh PzZ9dmCmkAE2f6JKMhf0xj6aFd2wVAucEBaQufMsY8J681s9wcEhEDm8goi6ARETNjkS FDDc6zc1mDJvcAt1drOS0CnuFlZjbHkyzHc4/v5+6WxYtZugEznBSpDIMAxuaHkYO6yP EvPQ== X-Received: by 10.50.43.233 with SMTP id z9mr275716igl.5.1415648207371; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.166.1 with SMTP id p1ls1216918ioe.99.gmail; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.182.131 with SMTP id ee3mr26990110pac.4.1415648206902; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9si884996igu.0.2014.11.10.11.36.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236; Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id nt9so6899887obb.27 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.92.234 with SMTP id cp10mr3555712obb.53.1415648206627; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.74.195 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.74.195 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:36:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:36:46 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: se klani be lo kafkylerfu From: And Rosta To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c305047baa4105078648e0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c305047baa4105078648e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 10 Nov 2014 18:08, "TR NS" wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 10, 2014 11:06:52 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote: >> >> >> 2014-11-10 19:05 GMT+03:00 And Rosta : >> >>> >>> On 9 Nov 2014 21:42, "TR NS" wrote: >>> > Chinese consistently ranks in the top of worst sounding language polls. >>> >>> Where are these polls, and what was their methodology? How many languages were being compared? >> >> >> and who were the respondents? > > > Just search the internet. It's not one specific poll. I'm just looking at the over all picture of dozens of polls and comments I found on the topic. I realize it's not one specific poll. If your observation about consistent results has some substantive basis, then it's lots of specific polls. I suspect there is no such thing as a consistent result across nonbullshit polls about worst sounding languages. But I am interested in being directed to a range of studies that prove my suspicion wrong. --And. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c305047baa4105078648e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 10 Nov 2014 18:08, "TR NS" <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 10, 2014 11:06:52 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-10 19:05 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and....@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> On 9 Nov 2014 21:42, "TR NS" <tran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Chinese consistently ranks in the top of worst sounding l= anguage polls.
>>>
>>> Where are these polls, and what was their methodology? How man= y languages were being compared?
>>
>>
>> and who were the respondents?=C2=A0
>
>
> Just search the internet. It's not one specific poll. I'm just= looking at the over all picture of dozens of polls and comments I found on= the topic.

I realize it's not one specific poll. If your observatio= n about consistent results has some substantive basis, then it's lots o= f specific polls.

I suspect there is no such thing as a consistent result acro= ss nonbullshit polls about worst sounding languages. But I am interested in= being directed to a range of studies that prove my suspicion wrong.

--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c305047baa4105078648e0--