Received: from mail-qc0-f192.google.com ([209.85.216.192]:34385) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xo5Yk-0003Y2-Jz for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:19 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f192.google.com with SMTP id x3sf1310190qcv.29 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=gZDxoWfNh0XoreKa7FPa7BOGPPQPP65M9fFwpf5O1Og=; b=d/BIAYcxC5tiTmt4v4ft2seLPaDg/8KfuHVu4viXVC64RhAqmAyr+MxZe5YULUPO8Y M2JZRdkv6qU4ho3y7pKWBfobUTckXohB+RADMik7sm0D4oAP/khYnM60kGjhCavSdFJ/ oNjoDxQJES8wzdLQlac4mY3dec5xQe7oKqW8sMz6Pb0eXMcsDJYXJzvqRsLGz4iVK/mG uwJVBIIuGi+sj4l5JOjRDG7TAVtNOkbhxlrpokcI8FUHKXlpko0QHQwkjBwYYBqdlLkZ qB8VWTpjTGV+CuK1i4k6bJgmtcyNOhdfIZScpNf/sSC/TSV2LCX8gw1qNQ0VJEET0XWP 6BCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=gZDxoWfNh0XoreKa7FPa7BOGPPQPP65M9fFwpf5O1Og=; b=yTu7L5SG/FV4smdyjdWLZGUD0l1VGigQZAExsnRCVg+tnXZLwI5k3Fhz6pXh/CDHOG NrkUhHvC7V70UtHPFEAMIfnZhb4D4KyX5Lv86tyYq0zrS6ugIQobUgRF6PZZ1rYsSr9s 1XQ126NH1NJlU2l4Z2LDIrisOd76tJsdtv/M19yPYkpBUExHxBnpNroa2Ig+sAD3PYFa kAl+rtzDEeHLoGzqan9kBgWgs1v1DRc1KPKU50xhCZyspFDvX78xWjWUDoanSpErcTlf P9q0JBvtrnOul72z8+PTGKsY2w4BdBOZao8jFNje8d0f8SDV0GGJw2aNlGBHcgCpvbDP gG2w== X-Received: by 10.140.19.193 with SMTP id 59mr4257qgh.19.1415689688072; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.22.8 with SMTP id 8ls2242443qgm.63.gmail; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.102.239 with SMTP id w102mr381qge.28.1415689687807; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:08:07 -0800 (PST) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <675b223b-cedb-465b-a0af-8c4c61f8a376@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: se klani be lo kafkylerfu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_279_1658434378.1415689687471" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_279_1658434378.1415689687471 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Monday, November 10, 2014 2:36:48 PM UTC-5, And Rosta wrote: I realize it's not one specific poll. If your observation about consistent > results has some substantive basis, then it's lots of specific polls. > > I suspect there is no such thing as a consistent result across nonbullshit > polls about worst sounding languages. But I am interested in being directed > to a range of studies that prove my suspicion wrong. > It the results were always all over the place then that would clearly be the case. But certain languages do seem to get consistent results. For instance Italian is frequently one the the highest rankings. Arabic get very mixed results --some love it, but others hate it (however I think some of it has to do with sociopolitical issues of the day). French does pretty well too. And Japanese gets a fair amount of consistent praise. Some examples: http://www.thetoptens.com/best-sounding-languages/ http://www.debate.org/forums/Society/topic/36130/ http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/5015558/1/ http://www.city-data.com/forum/world/1447488-most-annoying-sounding-language.html http://www.city-data.com/forum/world/649599-best-sounding-language-2.html http://www.daytranslations.com/blog/2014/10/top-ten-sexiest-languages-world-5611 https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110727163439AAIaek9 In any case, its not just that there are aesthetic considerations. There is also the simple fact that the `c/j`, `x` and `h` sounds are over represented as a simple statistic of internal comparison to other sounds in Lojban. Why should that be? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_279_1658434378.1415689687471 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Monday, November 10, 2014 2:36:48 PM UTC-5, And= Rosta wrote:

I realize it's not one specific poll. If your observation ab= out consistent results has some substantive basis, then it's lots of specif= ic polls.

I suspect there is no such thing as a consistent result acro= ss nonbullshit polls about worst sounding languages. But I am interested in= being directed to a range of studies that prove my suspicion wrong.

It the results were always all over the place then that woul= d clearly be the case. But certain languages do seem to get consistent resu= lts. For instance Italian is frequently one the the highest rankings. Arabi= c get very mixed results --some love it, but others hate it (however I thin= k some of it has to do with sociopolitical issues of the day). French does = pretty well too. And Japanese gets a fair amount of consistent praise. Some= examples:

http://www.thetoptens.com/best-sounding= -languages/ 
http://www.debate.org/forums/Society/= topic/36130/
http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/50155= 58/1/
http://www.city-data.com/forum/world/1447488-most-annoy= ing-sounding-language.html
http://www.city-data.com/forum/wor= ld/649599-best-sounding-language-2.html
http://www.daytransla= tions.com/blog/2014/10/top-ten-sexiest-languages-world-5611
h= ttps://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=3D20110727163439AAIaek9

In any case, its not just that there are aesthetic co= nsiderations. There is also the simple fact that the `c/j`, `x` and `h` sou= nds are over represented as a simple statistic of internal comparison to ot= her sounds in Lojban. Why should that be?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_279_1658434378.1415689687471--