Received: from mail-qg0-f63.google.com ([209.85.192.63]:43914)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDZL3AWL2MMBBFPQVSRQKGQENU6J4CQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Xqhfp-0006fY-5O
	for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:14:21 -0800
Received: by mail-qg0-f63.google.com with SMTP id l89sf497671qgf.18
        for <lojban-list-archive@lojban.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:14:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=IIZWgSrGjZKKWCTVw5b6kS3HqgjDFST7L/VoVOHV0Tc=;
        b=Kkhec3MzI62GU+J7qLMnwE2zR8dFG0Xuo8gOYbafPHkK/1Ok1Z9zDIoRu9wbDZyPLA
         SsFRYvqK8e4vJJqRG4K1hHAppdRM/a2a3SfvwQtfdSdAK55bFfvj3UqiEneD3iHd0BnO
         AopB15bawXQAzh1Qz4/18zwz8OhAKVcnJlbvv3uny+kBVjVxD2RzueYD3TyMoaAkfDhl
         F/Zf6L8DQEyRYl6/Q6wdkPSuZbieNdxVdNUd//WGRCeWlehYq4oH9N7do7g0OS66/dI0
         4e/XrNsqB/C8dN+w3uCpcSJQKoY0eVTsrNelmWzNSv241JHC7f0FAY+hoU6UTtLibgmS
         oJlA==
X-Received: by 10.140.32.74 with SMTP id g68mr1415qgg.22.1416312854101;
        Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:14:14 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.140.48.199 with SMTP id o65ls5500155qga.12.gmail; Tue, 18 Nov
 2014 04:14:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.101.227 with SMTP id u90mr1701qge.18.1416312853871;
        Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:14:13 -0800 (PST)
From: "la .gusek." <gunnar_secret@hotmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <a516c2c7-ed41-4e33-9991-70ed58328d75@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+hg7=agkcrk7Rbq+LUQStfX_tbXeKqykrNZ+K+W-NvDJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7bV+hg7=agkcrk7Rbq+LUQStfX_tbXeKqykrNZ+K+W-NvDJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: {zu'enai}. meaning
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gunnar_secret@hotmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_3903_689100077.1416312853503"
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_score_int: -9
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_3903_689100077.1416312853503
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Not really an answer to your question, but why would {zu'e mi viska ko'a} 
expand into {mi zuxte lo nu mi viska ko'a}? Who said that {mi} suddenly 
should occupy viska1? Couldn't a statement of the sort {zu'e mi do viska 
mi} = "By my volition, you saw me"? I.e. the {zo'e} in x1 shouldn't 
necessarely have the same referent as the {zo'e} in the {zu'e} tag... 
should it?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_3903_689100077.1416312853503
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Not really an answer to your question, but why would {zu'e=
 mi viska ko'a} expand into {mi zuxte lo nu mi viska ko'a}? Who said that {=
mi} suddenly should occupy viska1? Couldn't a statement of the sort {zu'e m=
i do viska mi} =3D "By my volition, you saw me"? I.e. the {zo'e} in x1 shou=
ldn't necessarely have the same referent as the {zo'e} in the {zu'e} tag...=
 should it?<br></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_3903_689100077.1416312853503--