Received: from mail-ee0-f60.google.com ([74.125.83.60]:39721) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XsXt0-0002b9-RV for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:36 -0800 Received: by mail-ee0-f60.google.com with SMTP id c13sf708549eek.25 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=++OJHZ+K0Bo6PaTxuY9Vexd51NMTKa+q2oLhzK+99GE=; b=lhRyMUmcux7wqKlCeaBPtbvplWXxo85N6ehKAWqbKwKdjIO3WRCcjQDxsnmve+oZu7 oowvVJn5d/P8agmNGHIqU7SBgBbgsJcwhbBcOAeDnkitnoooLIIXAOPZxveoLaKl/jsj wXHDGrLUgPKkbVaIALUlDKmZLlLcwk2SIiIvrGGJBez1jeuhNjmIopsBdrkX/KMdJp0k EnWOlQCo9XiiuLDt0SWbpNEwPDzG+n1e09qw88w2QYZjs0BNLaVQ2YVpwPSOabHWtMYp kSvtlYQqoEuPf0fhVxRSc/ldDX9YIzeMGhDh2aA8fb2IonLT8TqWcOBf0eOy4v0BF8iC PW0Q== X-Received: by 10.152.37.169 with SMTP id z9mr242978laj.2.1416751887039; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.23.130 with SMTP id m2ls344215laf.63.gmail; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.36.135 with SMTP id q7mr17788laj.8.1416751885710; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jj5si1183846lbc.0.2014.11.23.06.11.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f; Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id u10so3352143lbd.34 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.71 with SMTP id h7mr15119146laa.68.1416751885572; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:11:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141123010156.GJ24136@gonzales> References: <20141109215830.GB30874@gonzales> <20141112033820.GD15728@gonzales> <20141113021901.GM15728@gonzales> <20141118025013.GB7769@gonzales> <20141120023048.GA1571@gonzales> <20141123010156.GJ24136@gonzales> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:11:25 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tersmu 0.2 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28fa0dfe01c0508874032 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c28fa0dfe01c0508874032 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > > So for example, if yesterday morning it snowed out of a clear sky, but > in the afternoon it snowed while the sky was cloudy, and both of these > events are salient, what could you say about the truth value of > {ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ca bo lo dilnu cu > gapru}? > I would say its truth value is the same as the truth value of "ca lo prulamdei zo'u ca lo nu lo snime cu carvi kei lo dilnu cu gapru". I wouldn't say it's definitely true or false under the circumstances described, just as I wouldn't say that "lo kadno lanci cu xunre" is definitely true or false. I'd say it's a pragmatically inadequate thing to say in isolation, because "cabna" is not very well defined when cabna2 is an event that happens more than once, just as "xunre" is not very well defined when xunre1 is multicolored. I am understanding you as saying it would be false, while I would have > expected it to be true. So you would expect both of these to be true: ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ca bo lo dilnu cu gapru ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je ca bo lo dilnu cu gapru ? They may seem contradictory but they are not because of the hidden "su'o" you are assuming. I'd prefer to go with: ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ro roi bo lo dilnu cu gapru ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je su'o roi bo lo dilnu cu gapru (where I'm using "PA roi bo" with tense-like semantics). mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c28fa0dfe01c0508874032 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

So for example, if yesterday morning it snowed out of a clear sky, b= ut
in the afternoon it snowed while the sky was cloudy, and both of these
events are salient, what could you say about the truth value of
{ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ca bo lo dilnu cu
gapru}?

I would say its truth value is = the same as the truth value of "ca lo prulamdei zo'u ca lo nu lo s= nime cu carvi kei lo dilnu cu gapru".=C2=A0

I= wouldn't say it's definitely true or false under the circumstances= described, just as I wouldn't say that "lo kadno lanci cu xunre&q= uot; is definitely true or false. I'd say it's a pragmatically inad= equate thing to say in isolation, because "cabna" is not very wel= l defined when cabna2 is an event that happens more than once, just as &quo= t;xunre" is not very well defined when xunre1 is multicolored.

I am understanding you as saying it would be false, while I would have
expected it to be true.

So you would expect= both of these to be true:

=C2=A0ca lo prulamdei z= o'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ca bo lo dilnu cu gapru

<= /div>
=C2=A0ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je ca bo lo d= ilnu cu gapru

? They may seem contradictory but th= ey are not because of the hidden "su'o" you are assuming. I&#= 39;d prefer to go with:

=C2=A0ca lo prulamdei= zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je nai ro roi bo lo dilnu cu gapru

=C2=A0ca lo prulamdei zo'u lo snime cu carvi .i je su&#= 39;o roi bo lo dilnu cu gapru

(where I'm= using "PA roi bo" with tense-like semantics).=C2=A0
mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c28fa0dfe01c0508874032--