Received: from mail-wi0-f186.google.com ([209.85.212.186]:49608) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XwdSM-0003sW-5B for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:59 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f186.google.com with SMTP id l15sf1615537wiw.3 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=9bIqt3cOcYR6of1klwc3l8JxZacRHJlJMOTVB0zkI+Q=; b=GNKXpDd5R374waK9uY5o0J2Bw0AvKpZ+S+l2dSbb9bQBVvsRVzrm1X3RDLKxOSMpQE xikzhnyzlqtsoxVmBaCl0k88Gq4oztGxPLyUZTLUzPqdKQ7fSNPoLEJMp8QCO/npiYY+ GfqCj7/7IRW9HY2U9+BCLxI1HgRWRU2UlLoEnfsAN0AivwTwYPr/td5t2P0mmz77/gZg L53jGzn8gwF+JkiDWxvIRY50q/5yH4d7V2cMxPAE+VjBXv4YsMgBTU7vX1uiDk4S/IAs twOTGUMm29d0yeMP6dc8HaC/AVp7hP+FIz+qXc2c2F6UvndRMu4QWDPEfLWrOO2gnCtl EF2g== X-Received: by 10.180.20.203 with SMTP id p11mr137441wie.13.1417726611369; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.210.197 with SMTP id mw5ls2465619wic.41.canary; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.181.13.147 with SMTP id ey19mr17944257wid.2.1417726611001; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oi7si37673lbb.1.2014.12.04.12.56.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::234; Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so10178051lab.25 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.184.70 with SMTP id es6mr11466751lbc.85.1417726610866; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:56:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:56:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:56:50 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] pragmatics of {lo se nei} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133f92e07850705096a33ff X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a1133f92e07850705096a33ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > {lo nei} is quite useful, e.g. {li lumci lo nei}. > "mi lumci lo nei" is "I wash washers/the washer", right? > Any useful examples of {lo se nei}, {lo te nei} etc.? > Of course one could say > * {lo se nei cu lumci mi} = useless > *{mi klama lo te nei la bastn} = why not {ri}? > > However, are there any pragmatic examples where {lo SE nei} would create > conciseness or would be highly desirable? > I wouldn't call it highly desirable, but I suppose you can have things like "mi prami lo se nei be do", "I love those you love". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1133f92e07850705096a33ff Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.n= ame@gmail.com> wrote:
{lo nei} is quite useful, e.g. {li lumci lo nei}.

"mi lumci lo nei" is "I wash washer= s/the washer", right?=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Any useful examples of {lo se nei}, {lo te= nei} etc.?
Of course one could say=C2=A0
* {lo se nei = cu lumci mi} =3D useless
*{mi klama lo te nei la bastn} =3D why n= ot {ri}?

However, are there any pragmatic examples= where {lo SE nei} would create conciseness or would be highly desirable?

I wouldn't call it highly de= sirable, but I suppose you can have things like "mi prami lo se nei be= do", "I love those you love".=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1133f92e07850705096a33ff--