Received: from mail-qc0-f185.google.com ([209.85.216.185]:33688) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9K1g-000337-CV for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:54 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f185.google.com with SMTP id x3sf661118qcv.2 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=9xBavx9qc/6LHqRt+quAniw4mkyXLojbj0VSkfQyzxo=; b=WzgyHcktdEmO9ROA6WAO3slXYIYxeIDTSzpw8wlPqGQSnQSa9BJw7ymrTxx7TooWqJ TD6iIHBgYVhhZjNlj26R7NBKdgOe/DOokzmHti2596NYAHNk4H6vkhkNE4cn5dROpN1B ez8IkPOCpmuOKJU8bnJcUU1ug9WfTZFBmRQMWsQ+oGqsWMMolNWwJP7EjEEgCA6svL8y uW554/44mkz0VOnzWl5lclLJFvy+VOsu7kyRDIEV7wMg5eij5Zhvl0Y1+zaRS0oIhBue EXly2MfySh/5NoZz4WTnyuTMCnnNxmp7P/Nc3qemW/v8FHu7GzpUypEIHL505WjCAcLy Jdzg== X-Received: by 10.50.142.36 with SMTP id rt4mr241333igb.2.1420750186306; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.25.98 with SMTP id b2ls901969igg.34.gmail; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.235.4 with SMTP id ke4mr9141639icb.15.1420750185780; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e4si773763qcj.2.2015.01.08.12.49.45 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning lukeabergen@gmail.com does not designate 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9K1X-00032x-S8 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:44 -0800 Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:62734) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9K1W-00032c-Af for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:43 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id rp18so11623678iec.11 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.79.228 with SMTP id m4mr30316790igx.43.1420750175880; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:49:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.55.198 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:49:15 -0800 (PST) From: Luke Bergen Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:49:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] lo broda be fa lo brode To: "lojban-list@lojban.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a1f168c4c7b050c2a2d74 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.7 X-Spam_score_int: 7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Original-Sender: LukeABergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning lukeabergen@gmail.com does not designate 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Gotten a little rusty over the past year and was running through the CLL again as a refresher and while reading through chapter 5 a question occurred to me. If {lo broda} is roughly: "something which fills the x1 place of broda", then are {lo broda be fa lo brode} and {lo broda poi/noi/NOI ke'a brode} equivalent? [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.216.185 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (lukeabergen[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --089e013a1f168c4c7b050c2a2d74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Gotten a little rusty over the past year and was running through the CLL again as a refresher and while reading through chapter 5 a question occurred to me. If {lo broda} is roughly: "something which fills the x1 place of broda", then are {lo broda be fa lo brode} and {lo broda poi/noi/NOI ke'a brode} equivalent? If not equivalent, is it a major distinction or merely a subtle difference of flavor? Most helpfully, when (if) would you use one over the other? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e013a1f168c4c7b050c2a2d74 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gotten a little rusty over the past year and was running t= hrough the CLL again as a refresher and while reading through chapter 5 a q= uestion occurred to me.

If {lo broda} is roughly: "= something which fills the x1 place of broda", then are {lo broda be fa= lo brode} and {lo broda poi/noi/NOI ke'a brode} equivalent?
=
If not equivalent, is it a major distinction or merely a sub= tle difference of flavor?

Most helpfully, when (if= ) would you use one over the other?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e013a1f168c4c7b050c2a2d74--