Received: from mail-wg0-f57.google.com ([74.125.82.57]:57643) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YGSH4-0000Wf-Sg for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:15 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f57.google.com with SMTP id b13sf1789866wgh.2 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=57U5qHsNVLHnGSM6hMoybCWwbOKoG+eXZ1X4t1bDy1g=; b=nknshrR9mcGTDfRXo7kjZBeXLX/g1IQgwuRl01wlzl1moOhaIOIg4vWyMtkKcTOICa lVU76eoQRDaYzmWh8eQ+X8x5adHLS9Tq5P1b+drd63VvdWXEUmpS6WhOjE0R0mRtRDWF OdbrQglYegXM9SHd89/v9vHawPwJ9OKttIafHQU8OZTzWqe3n45o/IdGCgiifDyNT5FU 9YUuGCMOdimGWQUDe0dBuXOylgvITFUDU7D+W+jy4fU9XE742C5F3ZmzxbWNtRKI7kMt wXwSoT5wkN4EzsXJDiqF0x5zLKHyxP5n+radtl2yQPTE0iiwQyuqYvLTaoKQZdJUxe/x Ff5Q== X-Received: by 10.152.8.75 with SMTP id p11mr87382laa.37.1422450188131; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.25.201 with SMTP id e9ls135545lag.67.gmail; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.35.135 with SMTP id h7mr987154lbj.23.1422450187516; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s6si1086848wif.0.2015.01.28.05.03.07 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c; Received: by mail-we0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q59so20630296wes.3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.162 with SMTP id hl2mr7004914wjb.134.1422450187407; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.56.208 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54C80768.7020101@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:03:07 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {porsi} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102f212219692050db5fe8d X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:26 AM, la durka wrote: > I think there has to be a distinction between "ordered set" and > "sequence", no? Lojban seemingly conflates the two, but they're not the > same -- a set, ordered or not, can't have duplicate elements, but a > sequence can. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [74.125.82.57 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --089e0102f212219692050db5fe8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:26 AM, la durka wrote: > I think there has to be a distinction between "ordered set" and > "sequence", no? Lojban seemingly conflates the two, but they're not the > same -- a set, ordered or not, can't have duplicate elements, but a > sequence can. > For me, porsi relates a sequence porsi1 to its members porsi3, so for me there are no sets involved. Since an ordered set is a special type of sequence, we could have "rolcmipoi" or "cmipoi", "x1 porsi x2 lo ro cmima be x3" for ordered set, a sequence whose members are the members of a set. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e0102f212219692050db5fe8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:26 AM, la durka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:
I think the= re has to be a distinction between "ordered set" and "sequen= ce", no? Lojban seemingly conflates the two, but they're not the s= ame -- a set, ordered or not, can't have duplicate elements, but a sequ= ence can.

For me, porsi relates a= sequence porsi1 to its members porsi3, so for me there are no sets involve= d.

Since an ordered set is a special type of seque= nce, we could have "rolcmipoi" or "cmipoi", "x1 po= rsi x2 lo ro cmima be x3" for ordered set, a sequence whose members ar= e the members of a set.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e0102f212219692050db5fe8d--