Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54C8DABC.9030307@gmail.com>
References: <63c70fb2-f85a-49bf-8bac-848e04682b3a@googlegroups.com>
 <1434464239.890000.1422398168059.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CAO7bV+gi0vqEv2i=x6ooKVOePEPdBp_a7vVcDfRWn5S9YUje6w@mail.gmail.com> <54C8DABC.9030307@gmail.com>
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:02:55 +0300
Message-ID: <CAO7bV+iqxS94pPGtw3TBj99OzXKsf=jaEWWL2OLeanbxgfT7bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cc96e2a2d4c6050db5fe82
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  2015-01-28 15:49 GMT+03:00 Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:
    > As for the Lojban sentence proposed by Gleki, {mi puku viska lo vinji ca
    > lo nu lo se xi vei pa .a re no'a cu vofli ga'u la .tsurix.}, it can be
   > simplified to {mi puku viska lo vinji ca lo nu ri .a mi vofli ga'u la >
   .tsurix.}, which is similar to what I suggested but having «me and/or the
    > aircraft» as the flying thing; this is also structurally unambiguous,
   and > very explicitly not saying what exactly is flying (me, the aircraft
   or > both?). > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                             [209.85.217.191 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (gleki.is.my.name[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different

--14dae9cc96e2a2d4c6050db5fe82
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2015-01-28 15:49 GMT+03:00 Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>:

> As for the Lojban sentence proposed by Gleki, {mi puku viska lo vinji ca
> lo nu lo se xi vei pa .a re no'a cu vofli ga'u la .tsurix.}, it can be
> simplified to {mi puku viska lo vinji ca lo nu ri .a mi vofli ga'u la
> .tsurix.}, which is similar to what I suggested but having =C2=ABme and/o=
r the
> aircraft=C2=BB as the flying thing; this is also structurally unambiguous=
, and
> very explicitly not saying what exactly is flying (me, the aircraft or
> both?).
>

Of course, to say even shorter ambiguity is often just OR or XOR logical
operators implied by the tree so I have no idea what is meant by
monoparsing compared to English. What are the examples? Is it a resitrction
of Lojban grammar or vice versa a flexibility?

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--14dae9cc96e2a2d4c6050db5fe82
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
2015-01-28 15:49 GMT+03:00 Ilmen <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:il=
men.pokebip@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com</a>&gt;</s=
pan>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#F=
FFFFF">As for the Lojban sentence proposed by Gleki, {mi puku viska lo
    vinji ca lo nu lo se xi vei pa .a re no&#39;a cu vofli ga&#39;u la
    .tsurix.}, it can be simplified to {mi puku viska lo vinji ca lo nu
    ri .a mi vofli ga&#39;u la .tsurix.}, which is similar to what I
    suggested but having =C2=ABme and/or the aircraft=C2=BB as the flying t=
hing;
    this is also structurally unambiguous, and very explicitly not
    saying what exactly is flying (me, the aircraft or both?).<br></div></b=
lockquote></div><br>Of course, to say even shorter ambiguity is often just =
OR or XOR logical operators implied by the tree so I have no idea what is m=
eant by monoparsing compared to English. What are the examples? Is it a res=
itrction of Lojban grammar or vice versa a flexibility?</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--14dae9cc96e2a2d4c6050db5fe82--