Received: from mail-oi0-f59.google.com ([209.85.218.59]:60770) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YGqKZ-0005Ic-Vl for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:34 -0800 Received: by mail-oi0-f59.google.com with SMTP id h136sf5451383oig.4 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=bPf6auqwy8afySz09jIvtmldxZPwQtSt4t4wqxz46QE=; b=pLk+8lRCsElsuvz5KwmT+x+BJJr5EbPVsD84FfEt/ta2hNbb7NJSqhPzogjPoOjDuB E9KCdK9wDtGQwwXSz324UV48PGIe297ecEGHFatlKDWgk0685KqCRgKFigF/dsPRG8dt WSxhKobDB0SCiphVLYu84kF5EnZ1TKccTnST1dHozss51eVPCGNPqp+aj2dJuiwBWNy9 36SAhasEL21d5iLziIjdILzIRVhc8aABz7505i8T6EeIiV2WdnIigMJ9nXyDuc42nnbT ihWlaafT6l6HLXgpG6tjfRhQqsIOfmqvrgc0BUb+gIrNgAozOSgOq6tPcfy+mMJjODPp epQQ== X-Received: by 10.182.94.204 with SMTP id de12mr2412obb.17.1422542661934; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.197.193 with SMTP id iw1ls420261obc.59.gmail; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.55.99 with SMTP id r3mr664605obp.8.1422542661534; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com. [107.14.166.225]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i11si862626pat.2.2015.01.29.06.44.21 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:44:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=107.14.166.225; Received: from [98.122.190.249] ([98.122.190.249:49888] helo=bezitopo.org) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 66/2E-19792-4474AC45; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:44:20 +0000 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690A84BF1 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:44:19 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:44:15 -0500 Message-ID: <2356041.cOR673nncC@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-44-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:25:41 And Rosta wrote: > No. The ambiguity is syntactic. -Ing has no polysemy; it is merely the > default inflectional form of the verb. "-ing" is polysemous, though I don't think it's relevant to this sentence. It's both the present active participle, previously "-ind", cognate to German "-end", French "-ant" and Greek "-ων"; and the verbal noun, cognate to German "-ung". "I stopped flying" can be parsed with both meanings of "-ing", which doesn't change the meaning of the sentence much. [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.218.59 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders On Thursday, January 29, 2015 10:25:41 And Rosta wrote: > No. The ambiguity is syntactic. -Ing has no polysemy; it is merely the > default inflectional form of the verb. "-ing" is polysemous, though I don't think it's relevant to this sentence.= =20 It's both the present active participle, previously "-ind", cognate to Germ= an=20 "-end", French "-ant" and Greek "-=CF=89=CE=BD"; and the verbal noun, cogna= te to German=20 "-ung". "I stopped flying" can be parsed with both meanings of "-ing", whic= h=20 doesn't change the meaning of the sentence much. Pierre --=20 ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.