Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::234;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150207124548.GA1004@kuebelreiter>
References: <CAJHgu=_1DxYjopSX2GRxBbu+syJOD47W92m6+-fBA3PncnbNvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+gRpGLsCU0kULtC+KQbu7b8K7qs_KDSKHWtQzj43w=RpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dPm-MtP9Bz0m8zMeMR=feguXnEECs+wMofvOTK1vC1ruJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+gmUSrm3oqfi0Drzk-SWEiAU277KanRNWPzPx+2drRT3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dPnyZi9ro=vtvdUgDk1qwcZrnLmChfnjHjOHXDLy1SuDzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+hMRuh1Ah_hh1F6BPneDNZPwDth8MvSTWLtTXLSGaskEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dP=_SDdg-WT=6HwcynNfexHN0Huk0zDV1MAC05-_bWVW6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+hfMSgDtKf4gsS5M5bEthNOsMizHfCGoGEzWaNE0K7vSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dPmuW+VY6rB+den_TBRNBzNQH9ctW71dNwh2vDqzxux76w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO7bV+jL1gKgjr=ndz2gt7qQgvyAsJwt6SefDYvg_6R6zNWGUg@mail.gmail.com> <20150207124548.GA1004@kuebelreiter>
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:23:39 +0300
Message-ID: <CAO7bV+jcT2yEwgY_zWakb2yrzB-ip_dM5jbQLVzgji-oajFWgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] the myth of monoparsing
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66f4773318c5050e7f73f5
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  2015-02-07 15:45 GMT+03:00 v4hn <me@v4hn.de>: > On Sat, Feb
    07, 2015 at 09:23:38AM +0300, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > Sorry but if you
   don't understand Lojban then ... why all this > discussion here? > > I was
    trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with another level of > analysing
   text. > > Because And tried to make sense out of your trollish explanation
    w.r.t. > English. > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [74.125.82.55 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (gleki.is.my.name[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders

--047d7b66f4773318c5050e7f73f5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2015-02-07 15:45 GMT+03:00 v4hn <me@v4hn.de>:

> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:23:38AM +0300, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
> > Sorry but if you don't understand Lojban then ... why all this
> discussion here?
> > I was trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with another level of
> analysing text.
>
> Because And tried to make sense out of your trollish explanation w.r.t.
> English.
>

This explanation wasn't trollish. I truly believe that there is some
misunderstanding of how English text can be parsed, namely, that clauses
should not be necessarily attached to explicitly defined heads. Imprecise
numbers like {mo'e zo'e} could be used for parsing English as well.

And if And can't read Lojban sentences then a true comparison between
parsers for the two languages can't be made.

Is there anything more simple?
To talk about a subject one needs to be familiar with this subject.

Otherwise this reminds of "200 words for snow in Inuktitut".


>
> As this failed, I don't see any sense in further contributions to this
> thread..
>

That someone disagrees with you doesn't immediately mean he is not right.


>
>
> v4hn
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7b66f4773318c5050e7f73f5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">2015-02-07 15:45 GMT+03:00 v4hn <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:me@v4hn.de" target=3D"_blank">me@v4hn.de</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
adding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:23:38AM +0300,=
 Gleki Arxokuna wrote:<br>
&gt; Sorry but if you don&#39;t understand Lojban then ... why all this dis=
cussion here?<br>
&gt; I was trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with another level of ana=
lysing text.<br>
<br>
</span>Because And tried to make sense out of your trollish explanation w.r=
.t. English.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This explanation wasn&#39;=
t trollish. I truly believe that there is some misunderstanding of how Engl=
ish text can be parsed, namely, that clauses should not be necessarily atta=
ched to explicitly defined heads. Imprecise numbers like {mo&#39;e zo&#39;e=
} could be used for parsing English as well.</div><div><br></div><div>And i=
f And can&#39;t read Lojban sentences then a true comparison between parser=
s for the two languages can&#39;t be made.</div><div><br></div><div>Is ther=
e anything more simple?</div><div>To talk about a subject one needs to be f=
amiliar with this subject.</div><div><br></div><div>Otherwise this reminds =
of &quot;200 words for snow in Inuktitut&quot;.</div><div><br></div><div>=
=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
As this failed, I don&#39;t see any sense in further contributions to this =
thread..<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That someone disagrees with yo=
u doesn&#39;t immediately mean he is not right.</div><div><br></div><div>=
=C2=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8e=
x;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
<br>
v4hn<br>
</font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
--<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+uns=
ubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br>
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout" targ=
et=3D"_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7b66f4773318c5050e7f73f5--