Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+iumBUFu6bmxBoCVQGVaG2GLOovijNY7QAW1VgTUnJvQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7bV+hCaoyETCeVJufDxBrgnaKgqfT1eOLFFduYWadScpO2RQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<441592822.1242464.1422477652226.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
	<CAO7bV+iM0Qkc_N9ABZxfh8y193jY-P4NhX-+3PQgL7Uzmtp2-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPm5NZOuVK_6fNmY1Y-=-emq7x85T-_4yGA3E21UFGrGFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+hPPUReacaMbj0i_vSbFNgh6M7cjb4EG22hcTb8PbM_2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dP=mNU4shpb4XJ=o3+QO6nrehXG-5XaUKQ=yrT_h3OwwNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+h-0C6rBLzPFom46Oezc-FTRcwT9TFYMxV-BJuHk39scw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dP=TZmb+Ttzs9897q+=54SzD=SvbRYCgATjrJ7KW7kT2uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+hkh+i-7d-L79cBibWfF1RwzSppbVO1jB6jye+rS-eH7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPkasizEzU=Yq8xm=tSa5H7iFaJtSJHV-NSJcEk+2H=CKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+h3_2wZbkfceqVGPHjijeFBQ841+Aorc3YZqr3fTuLiyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dP=SirQvG=if1PQucev-HwHZQqPWTWG97Fa4Nf8LUSm9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+iumBUFu6bmxBoCVQGVaG2GLOovijNY7QAW1VgTUnJvQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:25:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CACf3dP=u0mxq0gCO2BpJT2G+or2=GAVxQj3i-H5HM6DB2MukZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Questions about Lojban
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdcab84003a3a050e81fd2b
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 7 Feb 2015 06:26, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
    wrote: > > > 2015-02-06 22:28 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
   >> >> Your belief that monoparsing is a myth seems to be intimately bound
   up with a deeply eccentric theory of English syntax that bravely discards
   the work of all syntacticians who have preceded you. I am not yet persuaded
    to abandon the current paradigm and embrace your new one. > > > When did
   I say that monoparsing is a myth in general? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.212.187 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (and.rosta[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders

--047d7bdcab84003a3a050e81fd2b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 7 Feb 2015 06:26, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-02-06 22:28 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Your belief that monoparsing is a myth seems to be intimately bound up
with a deeply eccentric theory of English syntax that bravely discards the
work of all syntacticians who have preceded you. I am not yet persuaded to
abandon the current paradigm and embrace your new one.
>
>
> When did I say that monoparsing is a myth in general?

Most prominently in titling the thread "The myth of monoparsing".

>
> I said "Since the original post on monoparsing as something unique or
defining feature of Lojban provided no examples on how this monoparsing
differs from English "

Fine, but the sentences of mine that you quoted above still apply to your
belief that monoparsing is not distinctive to Lojban but is shared with
natlangs.

--And.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7bdcab84003a3a050e81fd2b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On 7 Feb 2015 06:26, &quot;Gleki Arxokuna&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gleki=
.is.my.name@gmail.com">gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; 2015-02-06 22:28 GMT+03:00 And Rosta &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:and.rosta@g=
mail.com">and.rosta@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Your belief that monoparsing is a myth seems to be intimately boun=
d up with a deeply eccentric theory of English syntax that bravely discards=
 the work of all syntacticians who have preceded you. I am not yet persuade=
d to abandon the current paradigm and embrace your new one.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; When did I say that monoparsing is a myth in general?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Most prominently in titling the thread &quot;The myth of mon=
oparsing&quot;.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">&gt;<br>
&gt; I said &quot;Since the original post on monoparsing as something uniqu=
e or defining feature of Lojban provided no examples on how this monoparsin=
g differs from English=C2=A0&quot;</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Fine, but the sentences of mine that you quoted above still =
apply to your belief that monoparsing is not distinctive to Lojban but is s=
hared with natlangs.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">--And.</p>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7bdcab84003a3a050e81fd2b--